1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1.The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: "from March 19, 200 to 10, 200" in Part 2 of the judgment of the court of the first instance; "The above dismissal ruling became final and conclusive on October 7, 2013" in Part 16-17; "No. 2013Ra370 of the Seoul High Court but further reappeal was dismissed (Supreme Court Decision 2013Ma1369)" in Part 7 of the judgment of the court of the second instance; "No. 71 of the High Court Order No. 300, August 19, 2013" in Part 7 of the judgment of the court of the second instance; "No. 3 of the High Court Order No. 1960, Aug. 19, 2013," and "No. 2013 of the High Court Order No. 820, Aug. 19, 2013".

[Supplementary part] The defendant received 84.4 million won from our industry (hereinafter “Korea industry”) on March 15, 2007 from the plaintiff and agreed to liquidate all obligations and obligations with the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff can respond to the plaintiff’s claim of this case.