logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 (전주) 2018.11.26 2018누1522
공사중지명령 취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case which was used by the court as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article

2. Parts to be dried;

A. On the 2nd part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “vegetable plant-related facilities” in the 5th part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the term “vegetable plant-related facilities” in the 5th part of the 5th part of the 5th part of the 5th part of the 1999, “the instant disposition” in the 14th part of the 17th part of the 4th part “instant disposition” is as “the grounds for the instant disposition”; (b) the term “legal existence of the grounds for the disposition” in the 18th part “(a)” is as “the existence of the grounds for the disposition”; (c) whether there is deviation or abuse of discretionary power” in the 5th part “(5); (d) the term “(a)” in the 7th part “No. 10”; and (d) the term “No. 14” in the 14th part “No.

【B The Defendant did not make any assertion or proof as to the specific details of the damage incurred when the instant salt farm was newly constructed, in the event that the instant salt farm was newly built, due to the de facto subdivision of the instant salt farm, in the living environment of neighboring residents, such as malodor, air quality, water quality, noise, vibration, etc., and the environmental benefits of neighboring residents were more serious than the disadvantage the Plaintiff would suffer.

B. On the 3rd, 3, and 4th of the first instance judgment, “(see 1, 6th of the first instance judgment), 5th “No. 1”, 17th “(Evidence 1, 3th of the first instance judgment),” and 8 through 11th of the first instance judgment, and 9th of the first instance judgment from the 6th of the first instance judgment to the 5th “(Reference)”, 5th of the first instance judgment, 8 through 11th of the first instance judgment, and 6th of the first instance judgment, 5th of the second instance judgment to the 5th of the second instance judgment, 5th of the second instance judgment, 5th of the second instance judgment, 5th

It seeks the revocation of 1 administrative disposition for the addition or modification of the reasons for the disposition.

arrow