1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "Defendant A, B, D, and E shall be as follows: "Defendant A, B, and E shall be as Defendant A"; "F and four parcels" in Chapter 17 shall be as "H"; "P and four parcels" in Chapter 3 shall be as "H"; "P, 3, 8, 9, 13, 18, 5, 19, 6, 19, 6, 1, 3, 8, 10, 8 through 10, 8, 1, 4, 7, 9, 12, and 14 of the first instance court's judgment of the court of first instance, 3, 3, 19, 5, 6, 19, 8, 8, 8, 8, 1, 8, 8, 3, 9, 3, 9, 3, 9, 3, 14, 3, 9, 3, 18, 18, 1, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1., 1., 1., ., .

In addition, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as stated in the following Paragraph 2, and the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as follows. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as follows. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as follows. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as follows. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as follows. The part of the judgment of the defendants and the defendant joining the defendant is written as stated in the following Paragraph 3. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following Paragraph 3 is added.

2.As for the part 3rd and sixth, the following shall be added:

B. On September 18, 2007, Defendant C concluded a sales contract to purchase the instant apartment units of KRW 400,000,000 with the Intervenor joining the Defendant, and on September 18, 2007, the said sales contract was cancelled around September 2007.