Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 15, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”), driving a B carpon vehicle on September 15, 2013, and driving along the intersection of the front distance C in front of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along the speed of one lane in the direction of rapid turning

The right turn to international gas was made in the direction of international gas.

It is a private road intersection with a signal apparatus installed and a place where the vision is possible, so if a person engaged in driving service intended to turn to the left, he/she had a duty of care to turn to the left safely in such a way as not to obstruct the passage of the vehicle driving under the signals by temporarily stopping in front of the intersection in front of the intersection and by properly examining the front left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left at the speed, and received the part of the victim D(43 years old, n) E Spati in front of and rear the driver's seat in the car drive in front of and after the driver's seat in the car in front of the driver's seat in the car driven by the Defendant, with the front and rear door of the driver's seat in the car driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, caused the victim D to suffer the victim F (the age of 47) who was on board the string of the string of the vehicle in the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the strings

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, which caused the accident at the same time and place as that set forth in the preceding paragraph, caused the victim’s DNA driving E-ray vehicles to be in excess of KRW 4,145,200, total repair cost, and damaged them.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act operated the above B car engine on the road, which was not covered by liability insurance at the same time and place as the foregoing paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident under DNA preparation;

1. A traffic accident report and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1.Each.