A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving vehicles C.

On December 4, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 18:20 on December 18, 2014, and proceeded in the direction of Taedong-gu, Daegubuk-gu, along the three-lanes in front of the E store, from the direction of Taedong-do.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure the safe operation of a motor vehicle by accurately operating the steering and steering gear.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant received the back part of the part of the victim F (24 years old) driving G string vehicle in the same direction as the front part of the said string vehicle, and due to the shock, the said string vehicle was pushed down in the future, and the said string vehicle was caused by the front part of the string vehicle of the victim H(54 years old) driving in the front part.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, tried to stop immediately and stop to the victim K-K (57 years old) who was on the above spati vehicle with approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and absconded without taking necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victims'J (21 years old) who was on the above spati vehicle, for about two weeks of medical treatment. In addition, the Defendant, at around two weeks of medical treatment to the victim K-K (57 years old) who was on the above spatibus vehicle, suffered from approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as the spatied spaws and tensions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. A traffic accident report, etc. and a actual survey report;

1. Each medical certificate asserts that the defendant and his defense counsel had no intention to commit a crime of escape because the defendant suffered an injury to the extent that he could not take relief measures due to an accident. However, this court is legitimate.