A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc.) are the defendants engaged in driving B car cars;

On April 30, 2013, at around 08:30 on April 30, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, and driven the yellow underground map in the Yongsan-dong of the racing along two-lanes between the yellow underground map and the yellow underground map.

The location is an intersection where signal lights are installed in the front direction, and since the victim C(48 years old) driving vehicles are followed in the same direction, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure safety distance that can be avoided when the motor vehicle stops, and the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure safety distance that can be avoided when the vehicle stops.

Nevertheless, in order to avoid this error, the defendant neglected this and found the above math vehicle stopped in accordance with the stop signals, and operated the Hand as the left-hand side in order to avoid this error, but did not avoid it, and the left-hand side of the above math vehicle was shocked to the right-hand side of the above math vehicle of the defendant's driving, and due to the shock, the math vehicle was pushed down by the victim E(47 years old) who stopped in the front side while being pushed down in the front side.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim C’s salt ties and tensions requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, destroyed the above Maz vehicle owned by the victim C in an amount equivalent to KRW 3,792,658, and escaped without immediately stopping the above Kaz vehicle, which is owned by the victim E, and without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.