1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: C Housing Project (D; hereinafter “instant project”): Public notice by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on December 3, 2009

(b) Project operator: Defendant;

C. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on November 16, 2012 - The land to be expropriated: The land to be expropriated in the table below the F located in the Guri-si.

(hereinafter “each land of this case” and “O land of this case” in the order of order - The starting date of expropriation: December 17, 2012 - Compensation amount: the statement in the column of “adjudication of expropriation” as set forth below.

- Certified public appraisal corporations: Rad Public Appraisal Corporations and Samd Public Appraisal Corporations;

D. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on April 19, 2013 - Compensation: The following shall be as follows:

E. The result of the court’s entrustment of market price appraisal to appraiser G (hereinafter “court appraisal”) - Compensation for losses: The amount of the court’s appraisal indicated below is as follows.

(2) The Plaintiff’s land subject to expropriation. (1) The Plaintiff’s land subject to expropriation. (2) The amount of this adjudication is 957,580,500 Doz. 81,433,733,337,750 Daz. A’s land category and lot number No. 762,356,00 Doz. 518,698,050 Doz. 8,976,000 742,035,00 71,32,00 B I 1,50 1,508 933,527,400 Doz. 81,650,650,680 Doz. 680,000 Doz. 1,680,000 Doz. 937,80,509,000 Doz. 14, 200

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' compensation for losses in the adjudication on each of the lands of this case has been excessively underestimated because they failed to properly reflect the individual factors and other factors. Therefore, the compensation for the plaintiffs should be increased.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. (1) In fact, the appraisal appraiser for the ruling shall not be required to use the land of this case as a special-purpose area of 1,865 square meters before J: the natural green belt subject to development restrictions and the current status of use.