logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.02.13 2014구합98
손실보상금증액등
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: C University Medical and Industrial Complex Research Complex Development Project - Public notice of April 4, 2008, D, November 20, 2009, E

(b) Project operator: Defendant;

(c) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on August 22, 2013 - Land subject to expropriation: Land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 and objects listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter “each of the instant land and objects”) - The date of commencement of expropriation: October 15, 2013 - Compensation: Each of the following is listed in the “Adjudication on Expropriation” column:

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation for a corporation and a new appraisal corporation for the future;

D. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) dated December 19, 2013 - Compensation: As indicated below, “the amount of objection” as indicated below.

- Appraisal Corporation: the Pacific Appraisal Corporation and the Korea Appraisal Board;

E. The appraisal conducted by the appraiser F of this Court - Compensation for losses: The phrase “court appraisal” as set out below is as follows.

(3) The appraisal value of GH land 145,50,228,950,950,395,200,206,730,730,200, GI land 148,349,000,577,417,320, and 148,349,00,57,927,200,000, 54,604,604,60,700, 604,70860, 60,000, 60,000, 533,50,00, 60, 603,50, 603,50, 507, 101, 107, 106, 207, 148, 148, 200, 207, 2017, 2007, 2007, 2017

2. The plaintiffs' compensation for each of the lands and goods of this case is based on the appraisal of individual factors, and thus does not reach a reasonable amount of compensation. Thus, the defendant should additionally pay the difference between the reasonable amount of compensation and the compensation under the adjudication of this case.

3. The lawsuit concerning an increase or decrease of land expropriation compensation.

arrow