logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.15 2014구합50409
손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,310,350 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from September 11, 2013 to December 15, 2014.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: the Corporation for the Repair of Rivers-si in the Bancheon-si (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Public notice on August 28, 2012

(b) Project operator: Defendant;

(c) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on July 18, 2013 - The land to be expropriated is as indicated in the table “land to be expropriated” under B located in the Guri-si.

(hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case”) - The date of commencement of expropriation: September 10, 2013 - Compensation: The following indication is as follows:

- Appraisal Corporation: New Appraisal Corporation and Korea Appraisal Corporation;

D. Adjudication by the Central Land Tribunal on an objection - Compensation: The following “amount of the objection” is described as follows:

- An appraisal corporation: a virtual appraisal corporation and a dialogue appraisal corporation;

E. The result of the market price appraisal entrustment to the appraiser C by this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”): Compensation for losses: The court’s appraisal amount as indicated below is as follows.

(2) The fact that the land subject to expropriation is subject to expropriation (1) 379,597,114,500,60,473,00 39,473,00 miscellaneous 391,4106,000 miscellaneous 394,516,000 miscellaneous 124,516,000 miscellaneous 145,516,000 54,5405,70 558,500 miscellaneous 3797,114,500 60,600,601,473,00 miscellaneous 106,000 miscellaneous 3941,000 miscellaneous 233,105,004,000 7218,16,536,205, 306, 307, 165, 206, 307,

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s compensation for losses in the adjudication on each of the lands of this case, which was alleged by the Plaintiff, has been excessively underestimated due to the Plaintiff’s failure to reflect the individual factors and other factors. Therefore, the compensation for losses should be increased.

(b)in litigation with respect to the increase or decrease of judgment compensation, the appraisal by each appraisal agency and the court appraiser.

arrow