logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.28 2014고단4659
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 8, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging a private signature, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court, and was provisionally released on August 14, 2012 during the execution of the sentence.

9.5. The parole period has expired.

1. On December 31, 2013, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, following the Defendant’s failure to pay KRW 65,00,00 after drinking alcohol and alcohol in the restaurant located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D”, the Defendant was required to notify the police officer F of the Seocho Police Station E Zone of the name and resident registration number called out after receiving the said restaurant proprietor’s report.

At the time, the Defendant was aware of the name and resident registration number of “G”, which is his/her death relationship, in order to escape from arrest as he/she was suspected of being suspected of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

2. At the Seocho Police Station E District in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (a) stated in the name column of the written statement that “G”, “I” in the resident registration number column, “Seoul Jongno-gu J1 floor in the original domicile column; and (b) stated in the content column that “I would enter a D restaurant located in K on December 31, 2013 in the form of the written statement to the effect that “I would drink one minute per person and two soldiers per week, but the remittance would not have been performed smoothly; (c) stated that “G” was arbitrarily written and signed as “G”.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a copy of G name, which is a private document related to the certification of facts.

3. The Defendant submitted a written statement under the name of the G forged at the place specified in paragraph (2) at the time and time, as described in paragraph (2), to F, who was unaware of the fact.

Accordingly, the Defendant used the forged private document as above.

4...

arrow