1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 20,000,000 to the Plaintiff and Defendant B with respect thereto from July 25, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B is a medical doctor operating Bsan Mawon (hereinafter “Defendant Council member”) in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant School Foundation’s Echemical Group (hereinafter “Defendant Juristic Person”) is a juristic person operating the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Yangcheon-ro 1071 Gyncheon-ro University’s University affiliated with the Egynam University’s University (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. On October 12, 2013, the Plaintiff (D students) applied to the Defendant Council member to the domicile of symptoms of the completion period (hereinafter “Defendant Council member’s first head”) on the right bank of the right bank (hereinafter “Defendant Council member’s first head”) and the Defendant B confirmed the Plaintiff’s first head of five kinds of 0.6 to 1.7 cm in size on both sides, as a result of the Plaintiff’s examination on the extension of the right bank, and requested the Plaintiff to provide medical treatment to the department outside the Defendant hospital for additional examination and treatment.

C. On October 15, 2013, the Plaintiff was inspected on protruding and protruding from the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital’s hospital (hereinafter “the first internal hospital of the Defendant hospital”) on the part of the medical personnel, and as a result, 1.59 x 0.57 cm, 0.57 cm, 0.84 x 0.68 cm, 0.68 cm, 1.68 x 0.57 cm, 1.46 cm in the direction of 1.16 cm in the direction of 12.16 cm in the direction of the Defendant hospital (hereinafter “the first internal hospital of the Defendant hospital”).

The medical staff of the Defendant Hospital explained the Plaintiff that the organization inspection can be conducted in the event of observation, such as changes in shape, etc., after conducting the presumed salvines or tracking inspection of the salvines presumed to be trained, and instructed the Plaintiff to conduct the tracking inspection six months thereafter.

On April 29, 2014, which was about six months after the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff was under the supervision of the head of the Defendant hospital, and was under the supervision of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, and the head of the Si/Gun/Gu. As a result, the Plaintiff was under the control of the second head of the Si/Gun/Gu, and was under the direction of the tracking inspection three years after the observation of changes in the disease.

On October 1, 2015, approximately one year and five months after the Plaintiff returned to the Defendant Council member (hereinafter “Defendant Council member”) (hereinafter “Defendant Council member”), and Defendant B, the Plaintiff.