1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) Defendant E is the Hwon in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) On March 30, 2012, the Defendant F is the employer of the medical staff at the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant F is the doctor affiliated with the Defendant Hospital. (3) The Defendant F removed on the part of the Defendant Hospital nine chimtome from both sides to the Mammotome, and undergo a medical examination by periodically visiting the nine chimtome from April 9, 2012 to December 28, 2013. The examination is requested on January 8, 2014 to the Seoul University Hospital (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the deceased was the husband of the deceased, and the Plaintiff C and D were the offspring’s children.

B. (1) On March 17, 2012, the Deceased’s medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital (including the Defendant F, who was the head of the dental hospital) was released from the Defendant Hospital for the first time. The Deceased’s medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital”).

(2) On March 26, 2012, the Deceased explained that the form of the deceased’s satise satis (Fibronomanomahyphsia) from medical professionals in the Defendant hospital was satise nine species at both relics of the deceased, and that the deceased’s satise was satise satis (Fibronomahyphsia) and was performed to remove the deceased’s satise with satise.

3) On March 30, 2012, the medical team at Defendant Hospital removed nine sons of both sides of the deceased as the Mamomomotom, and the deceased discharged at Defendant Hospital on April 9, 2012, the deceased discharged the deceased from Defendant Hospital on the 31st day following the following day. (4) On April 9, 2012, the deceased was informed by Defendant Hospital that nine sons were all trained from Defendant Hospital’s medical team’s medical team’s organizational inspection results, and the medical team decided to inspect the Mamotom for three months after the lapse.

5) On July 14, 2012, the Deceased was inspected by visiting the Defendant Hospital at his own expense, and there was no exceptional fact. 6) The Deceased was inspected by visiting the Defendant Hospital on October 27, 2012.