logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.02.03 2015고정1342
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business owner arranging sexual traffic through the Internet site advertisement called "B", and C is a person employed by the defendant and engaged in sexual traffic as a female employee, and no one shall arrange, solicit, induce, induce, or compel sexual traffic, or provide a place for sexual traffic, for the business of engaging in sexual traffic in promising to receive or promise money, valuables, and other property benefits to unspecified persons.

From May 25, 2014 to July 20:30, 2014, the date and time of control, the Defendant: (a) leased Nos. 1440 and 1450 of the D Building 140 and 1450 in Goyang-si, Yongsan-si; (b) employed a female female of sexual traffic; and (c) reported commercial sex acts on the Internet website to unspecified men, who were found to have reported commercial sex acts on the Internet website; and (d) assisted commercial sex acts, such as providing guidance to a family room where the female of sexual traffic is staying by him/her by receiving KRW 1.30,000 from 1.5 billion in return for commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. List and record of seizure;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. Application of Internet advertising pictures and field photographs-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense (excluding punishment)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (a) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant has already committed a crime similar to the same kind of crime and has already been sentenced to a sentence by the court of first instance, and continues to exist in the appellate trial after having been sentenced to a sentence by the court of first instance, the defendant is divided by mistake, the support relationship of the defendant, and economic circumstances of the defendant) and

arrow