beta
Text
Defendant
A and D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000, and Defendant C and E shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
Defendant
A, D, C, and E.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A The Central Office of the I University, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D’s school foundation office of the I University, Defendant D’s general office of the I University, and Defendant E’s office of the J University.
The victimO is a professor who was subject to a disposition of removal from office by a private teaching institute LO on January 9, 2014 when he/she was in office as an I university professor located in K from March 3, 1996, and as a full-time professor, and on January 2, 2014. The victim M is a professor who was subject to a disposition of removal from office by the above school foundation on January 9, 2014.
1. Around November 15:00 on November 6, 2014, Defendant C made one victim’s demonstration before the I University’s sentiments located in K, and even though it could be recognized by an unspecified majority, Defendant C expressed in front of the victim that “a sprinke, sprinke, spule, and spule” expressed in front of the victim, thereby openly insulting the victim’s M.
2. Defendant E, at around 09:30 on September 1, 2015, submitted a meeting report to the head of the competent police station along with P and demanded the president of the International University to leave the office of police station in order to hold a meeting, and Defendant E, even though it could be recognized by a large number of unspecified persons, may engage in a meeting.
"In the facts charged" shall be discarded according to the head of the household.
“Although described in “,” it shall be modified and recognized as “Diveryra” as the voice recorded in the CD.
In other words, the victim publicly insulting the victim'sO.
3. Defendant A and D conspired, and around 09:40 on October 7, 2015, Defendant A and D conducted one demonstration by one victim’sO in front of the I University’s sentiments located in K in Masung, and even if an unspecified majority could be recognized, Defendant D is on the side of the Preferredet stating “a person (O) who has been removed by failing to perform research due to his/her failure to perform his/her research performance,” and Defendant D will “on the side of the victim’sO.”
“,” and “prisoners
“......”