beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 86,302,301 to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 7, 2017 to February 13, 2017.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On March 30, 200, Plaintiff C entered into a lease agreement with Nonparty E, the owner of the instant house, at the time, at the time regarding KRW 301,00, among the three multi-households of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D brick Do-Slves Shelf (hereinafter “instant housing”). Around that time, Plaintiff C paid the said lease deposit to Nonparty E, who was the owner of the instant housing, and resided in the said 301 from April 30, 200, and was subject to the said 301 house lease registration on May 1, 2003.
B. Around June 15, 2000, Plaintiff F entered into a lease agreement with the above E on KRW 38,000,000 with respect to the instant housing as to KRW 201 among the instant housing, and around that time, Plaintiff F paid the above lease deposit to a person with poor name, and began to reside in the said 201 after filing a move-in report with the fixed date date.
C. On 27th day of December, 1996, Plaintiff G entered into a lease agreement with Nonparty 1, who was the owner of the instant housing, and Nonparty 24,000,000 won of the deposit for lease with Nonparty 1, who was the owner of the instant housing at the time. Around that time, Plaintiff G paid the deposit for lease to Nonparty 1, who was the owner of the instant housing, and began to reside on December 16, 1996 with the fixed date move-off report and reside on 01.
The ownership of the building of this case was transferred from the above E on August 4, 2004 to the non-party H, to the non-party I on June 15, 2006, to the defendant on July 18, 2008, and the plaintiffs continued to reside in each of the above real estate while concluding a renewal or renewal of the above lease agreement.
E. Meanwhile, on July 28, 2006, Plaintiff G received a total of KRW 10,697,699 out of the above lease deposit on the date of distribution of the J real estate J compulsory auction case at this court, and received payment around that time.
E. The Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor is in accordance with the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents in order to implement a housing redevelopment improvement project with the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K, L, and M as a project implementation district (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”).