logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.06.02 2013가단36600
사해행위취소 등
Text

1. The contract of donation amounting to KRW 40,000,000 entered into on July 3, 2009 between Nonparty C and the Defendant shall be revoked.

2. The defendant.

Reasons

1. The following facts are based on facts: (a) the plaintiff and the defendant did not dispute each other; (b) Gap evidence 1-1, (c) 2, 5, and 6; (c) Gap evidence 8-3; and (d) Gap evidence 9-1 [the non-party D Co., Ltd. (the non-party C name is referred to as "D Co., Ltd."), and the authenticity of this part of the document is presumed to have been established, as the non-party C's seal is not disputed; (d) Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 5, Eul evidence 6; (e) Eul evidence 15-4, 5, and Eul evidence 17; and (e) the inquiry results of this court's Gyeonggi Credit Guarantee Foundation of this case and other various circumstances shown in the argument of this case; (e) the moving-in report was actually filed on the leased object during the period of this lease; and (ii) the non-party D Co., Ltd.

) In order to obtain a start-up loan, the above lease contract was submitted with the application document of credit guarantee agreement entered in and sealed on the above foundation’s “lease confirmation letter”, and the contract was actually used with the above credit guarantee agreement, and it was prepared not only to borrow 30 million won from the Industrial Bank of Korea but also to use the above loan. ③ At the time of the expiration of the above lease term, the defendant also recognized that the amount deposited from the account in the name of the non-party E in the above name of the non-party E was accurately and accurately sufficient to use the above deposit amount of KRW 40 million, and ④ the above amount of KRW 40 million deposited from the account in the name of the non-party E was used as the deposit amount in the new residence of the non-party F, and the defendant asserted that the above amount was paid as the deposit amount in the name of the non-party F, and was merely received the right of lease in the name of the defendant for 65 million won and 30 million won from the above account in the name of the non-party.

arrow