beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
-criminal power- The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year at the Gwangju District Court on January 27, 2014 for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
·criminal facts-
1. After becoming aware of the so-called “work loan” business operator who received a loan from a financial institution by falsely preparing documents, etc. via the Internet, the Defendant conspireds with the above business operator B, C, D, etc., and, in fact, even though the Defendant did not have concluded a pre-sale contract on the apartment owned by E, the Defendant concluded the pre-sale contract for the above apartment and made a false pre-sale contract for the apartment and received a loan from a financial institution as security, as if the pre-sale contract was
On February 17, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with B, C, D, etc., submitted a false real estate lease agreement which was prepared as if the Defendant had a deposit amount of KRW 280,000,000 for F apartment 515,000,000,000 for the F apartment 515,000,000 in Seongdong-gu, Sungnam-si, to the employees in charge of the above bank loan at the National Bank, and entered into a false real estate lease agreement with the building owner as if he/she had a deposit amount of KRW 280,000,000,000 in total. The Defendant
However, the Defendant did not actually conclude the above lease contract, and the deposit was not paid, and even if the loan was executed, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and interest normally.
In collusion with B, C, D, etc., the Defendant, by deceiving the above employees and by deceiving them from the above employees, intended to acquire money owned by the National Bank, the victim, for the purpose of loans from the above employees, but did not bring about such intent due to the refusal to approve the loan.
2. The criminal defendant was killed in the work loan as stated in the above Paragraph 1, and conspired with the person who was killed in the name (one-person G) in collusion, and the facts are owned by the defendant.