1. The Defendant points out each of the attached drawings indication 1, 2, 3, 4 and 1 among the real estate listed in the attached list to the Plaintiff.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, it may be acknowledged that, on June 3, 2014, C, the husband of the Plaintiff, leased the real estate listed in the Disposition No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendant on June 3, 2014, KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 1,485,00 (including value-added tax and management expenses), and the lease period from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2016, but did not receive KRW 15 million out of the deposit and KRW 11,553,620 as of February 18, 2016, the Plaintiff, who owned the said real estate 3/5 shares, notified the Defendant of the termination of the said lease contract on the grounds of arrears for more than two years through the instant complaint.

According to the above facts of recognition, since the lease contract on the real estate of this case was lawfully terminated by the delivery of the complaint of this case containing the declaration that it will be terminated, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.