1. The defendant shall order that the plaintiff is marked with the indication of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 of the same drawings among the second floor of the real estate stated in the attached list.

In full view of the facts that there is no dispute between the parties, and the overall purport of the pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the fact that the plaintiff, on March 16, 2015, attached Table Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 (hereinafter referred to as "the real estate in this case") connecting the two real estate units of real estate indicated in the attached Table No. 202 to the defendant on March 16, 2015, notified the defendant of the termination of the above lease agreement on the grounds that the lease deposit was KRW 7 million, monthly rent of KRW 700,000,000 from March 23, 2015 to March 22, 2017.

According to the above facts, since the lease contract on the real estate of this case was lawfully terminated on or around September 8, 2015 by the plaintiff's declaration of intention of termination, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff in its restitution.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.