1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants are each indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the real estate indicated in the separate sheet No. 1.

In full view of the evidence Nos. 1 through 4 as a whole, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to October 2, 2014 to the Defendants is ordered No. 1-A.

It can be acknowledged that the real estate stated in the subsection (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) was leased with a lease deposit of KRW 50 million, monthly rent of KRW 3520,000 (including value-added tax), and the lease period from October 25, 2014 to October 24, 2016, but it was delivered with a lease deposit of KRW 35,000,000 out of the lease deposit, but the Defendants did not pay rent from November 25, 2014 while running a restaurant business after having registered the business in the name of Defendant B from the instant real estate, and the Plaintiff notified the termination of the said lease on the grounds of arrears of rent of at least two years through the instant complaint.

According to the above facts, since the lease contract on the real estate of this case was lawfully terminated by the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case containing the expression of termination, the defendants are obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff to its original state, and the defendants are jointly and severally obligated to pay to the plaintiff the amount equivalent to the rent or the rent from November 25, 2014 to the completion of delivery of the real estate of this case by 3.52 million won per month.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and all of them are accepted, and it is so decided as per Disposition.