Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is to be disclosed to the Defendants.

The summary of the facts charged is that the telephone financial fraud crime organization in the 2017 High 2017 High 1822, using the call center in Korea and other than the Republic of Korea, intended to commit the crime of “scaming” in the name of another person who receives money from the account secured in advance by deceiving victims by putting up a free phone or sending text messages to the victims by misrepresenting them to the prosecution, police, financial institutions, etc., and by scam personal information leakage or credit loans.

On March 30, 2017, the name influor who is the cause of the above telephone finance fraud crime organization will make a loan by making phone call to the victim E at an influorous place.

On March 31, 2017, by deceiving the F to transfer KRW 10 million to the Saemaul Treasury account of F on the same day. On March 31, 2017, the F made the victim G calls to the victim G and misrepresenting him to the Financial Supervisory Service’s staff H, and could not be the money of the head of the Tong that the son used the victim’s passbook and used the victim’s passbook to deposit money to the national security virtual account. On the same day, the F transferred KRW 30 million to the Defendant B’s account, and transferred KRW 29 million to the Saemaul Treasury in the name of F.

1. Defendant A accepted the offer that “I will receive money from a person at a location to be known to him/her, and then will pay for 1% of the deposit amount at the account by depositing this money to the account,” from a person who is a member of the telephone financial fraud criminal organization.

A. On March 31, 2017, around 10:53, the Defendant deposited KRW 100,000 deposited by the victim E from the victim F in the vicinity of the exit area of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Bolara, into the account directed by the victim E, and was waiting to deliver KRW 29,00,000,000 deposited by the victim G, and the Defendant did not receive the victim’s suspension of payment due to the suspension of payment.

Accordingly, a person who is not aware of his name shall defraud 39 million won from the victim by deceiving the victim, and the defendant shall be a person who is not aware of the above name.