logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.06.20 2013고단374
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 27, 2013, at around 22:39, the Defendant driven a Dpoter II truck under the influence of alcohol with approximately 50 meters alcohol concentration 0.149% without obtaining a driver’s license, from the front side of the cafeteria of the “Guldong” in the Dolsan-si movable-dong to the front side of the State Post Office located in the same city, the Defendant driven a Dpoter II truck without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. When the Defendant, while driving a vehicle in the influence of alcohol on the roads front of the above Jeju Post Office at once and at the same time, he saw that he would run as if he was the Defendant, using the fact that he was similar to that of his birth E and his resident registration number and carried out his resident registration number.

On the same day, at around 22:48, the Defendant signed “E” without authority in the signature column to enable the Defendant to write his/her signature by presenting PEA in order to enter his/her personal information and details of the violation, etc., as the Defendant entered in the report on the result of drinking driving control in the police network by accessing the police police station guard traffic and the situation under his/her jurisdiction to the police station (portable information terminal) within the police bus parked in front of the above Jeju Free Port Office, as the Defendant entered the foregoing E’s personal information and the details of the violation, etc., and then entered the signature.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

B. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in the above paragraph (a) as if he were true, a written statement of the results of the influence of drinking driving with a forged signature was sent to F as if he were aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised his signature of a forged person.

3. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. The Defendant may collect blood when he acted as E at the time and place stated in paragraph 2(a) and when he acted as E. The Defendant recognized the result of measurement by using the tample, and in case of unjust collection.

arrow