logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.05.21 2013고단2435
대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment of 8 months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

(a) Any person who intends to engage in credit business in violation of the Registration of Credit Business and Protection of Financial Users Act shall make a registration with the competent administrative agency having jurisdiction over the relevant place of business by place of business;

Nevertheless, on May 22, 2008, the defendant extended a loan of 25 million won to the victim F, which is operated by the victim F in Seongdong-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, and the victim deducted 1250,000 won from the prior interest and 1.250,000 won per month and paid

In addition, from around that time to March 31, 2012, the Defendant loaned a total of KRW 177,500,000 to the victim as shown in the attached crime list (1). From June 23, 2008 to January 14, 2013, the Defendant was granted a total of KRW 27,9620,00 from the victim as principal and interest.

Accordingly, the Defendant engaged in unregistered credit business.

B. A debt collector who violates the Fair Collection of Claims Act shall not engage in any act that seriously undermines privacy or peace in business by repeatedly speaking, writing, sound, image, etc. in connection with debt collection without any justifiable reason and causing fear or apprehensions by reaching the debtor. However, the Defendant sent text messages that repeatedly cause apprehensions to the victim 13 times in total from February 28, 2013 to April 30, 2013, as shown in the List of Crimes (2).

2. Defendant B

(a) Any person who intends to engage in credit business in violation of the Registration of Credit Business and Protection of Financial Users Act shall make a registration with the competent administrative agency having jurisdiction over the relevant place of business by place of business;

Nevertheless, on October 1, 2009, the defendant extended a loan of 20 million won to the victim F, which is operated by the victim F in Seongdong-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, and the victim deducted 20 million won from the prior interest and 10 copies per month.

In addition, from around that time to November 9, 2012, the defendant is a list of crimes (3).

arrow