beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with labor for two years, the first crime of the judgment of the defendant B, and the first crime list of the annexed crimes of B(2) of the judgment of the court.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On September 16, 2010, the sentence was finalized on the 25th of the same month, which was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution for the crime of conflict in the Netcheon Branch of the Gwangju District Court.
1. The Defendants’ co-principal
A. Defendant A is a person who served as the deputy head of Knman Plant General Affairs Team, and Defendant B was a person who served as L reporter.
On January 1, 2010, the Defendants: (a) through Defendant A, who had been working in the general affairs team of the leisure plant of the K, conspired to induce the neighbors to be employed in the leisure plant, and receive money from them in return for employment as if they could be employed in the leisure plant; and (b) to acquire money from them.
As a result, Defendant B made a false statement that “When there is the deputy head of K General Team A, such division may be deducted from old age, and when managing the K company’s house, Defendant B may be employed through former executives who were drank in the course of managing the company’s house.”
However, in fact, the Defendants did not think that they would receive money from the victims to use them as their living expenses, etc., and did not have any idea to have the victims work for the above Knman Factory, and there was no special employment error for the chairman of the Nnman Factory at that time. Therefore, even if they were to receive money from the victims as a remuneration for employment, they did not have any intention or ability to have the victims work for the above company.
The Defendants deceiving the victims through theO and received KRW 70,00,000 from the victims of the instant crime from Q in Q at Q at the time around March 2010, as shown in the attached crime list (1). In addition, the Defendants deceptiond the victims by the same method four times between the date and May 2010 during the period from the above date to the police officer in the same manner as indicated in the attached crime list.