Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for five months, each of the defendants B shall be punished.

Criminal facts

[Criminal Records] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for fraud, etc. at the Jeonju District Court on July 16, 2015 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for the same year.

7.24. The judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed as follows: (a) the Defendants would have been employed by their members of the company who want to have their own employment, while driving as if they had their fathers and beer among many companies; (b) the Defendants would have been employed by themselves.

During the process of receiving money and valuables, in order to request the return of KRW 10 million received from E while arranging the employment of the children, the victim F wishing to receive self-employment was introduced, and the victim is willing to receive money and valuables in the name of the self-employment referral from the injured party and pay them to E.

As above, Defendants B conspired with the above, in a place where it is not known that Defendant B was a senior policeman or lower on February 2013, 2013, there is a person who can be employed by the victim for mobilization or temporary employment as a public official.

While stating that the curriculum vitae of the young children is necessary and the case fee for job placement is needed, the injured children received the curriculum vitae from the injured children.

On February 18, 2013, the Defendants continued to introduce Defendant B as a person who can be employed by Defendant A while stating that “In order to be employed by Hyundai Motor, there is personnel rights and personnel rights with executives and employees who have been employed by the labor union in order to be employed by Hyundai Motor, it is the personnel rights with executives and employees, and it is the personnel rights to be employed by the executives and employees.” Defendant A participated in this and Defendant A said that “The case expenses will be employed by the party to the case by being employed by the party to the case to the modern Motor.”

However, in fact, the defendants did not have a person who is aware of modern automobiles, and even if they received money from the injured party, they shall be paid to E, etc. for the purpose of employment mediation.