A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On June 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at a restaurant in which the name near the GS apartment located in Songjin-gu, Seocheon-gu, Jeonjin-gu, Jeondong-gu, Jeondong-gu, was unknown, the Defendant told the victim B to the effect that “I may request the person entitled to exercise his influence over Hyundai Motor, thereby allowing the children to be employed as a modern automobile employee by requesting that person to do so; and (b) at the same place on June 30, 2015, the Defendant could have the victim be employed as an employee of Hyundai Motor.” (a) At the same place, the Defendant could have the victim take a job by sending counseling to the head office of the Hyundai Motor, who was employed within his/

(1) The term “the school expenses” means the school expenses.

However, the facts did not know of the modern car staff who can decide employment, and there was no plan to arrange employment for the victims' children, so even if the victims received money, they did not have the intent or ability to have the children employed as the modern car staff.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is therefore subject to the control of the victim on June 30, 2015, 20 million won under the pretext of the control of the victim, and the same year.

9. The sum of KRW 55 million, including KRW 20 million and KRW 15 million on December 12, 198 of the same year, was remitted to the former North Bank Account (C) in the name of the Defendant and acquired it by deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint (including accompanying documents);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that any criminal defendant who has no record of committing any crime is divided by mistake and the fact that the criminal complaint has been revoked by mutual consent with the victim);