logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.03.27 2014고단6994
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around October 10, 2013, the Defendant stated to the effect that “Around October 10, 2014, the Defendant would not cause damage by normally repaying the interest of loans and the principal of the loan on the face of the lending company,” to the victim E, who is a Dong fee, in D office located in the Seoul Special Self-Governing City, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si. That is, there was no factory lease deposit 10 million won. In doing so, the Defendant offered a loan application to the Seoul Special Self-Governing Province of the lending company, due to low credit rating, would have to establish a guarantor.”

However, the Defendant did not notify the victim of the above circumstances even though he was planned to obtain a loan of 30 million won in total from 3 lending companies, and was in excess of the obligation, such as the obligation to pay 160 million won at the time. Therefore, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and interest of the above loan normally and to cause the victim as the guarantor not to bear the guaranteed obligation.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received a guarantee for the above loan obligation from the victim, and took out a loan from 30 million won on October 23, 2013 from the lending company, such as the ABS loan, etc., and did not pay the principal and interest, thereby making the victim liable for the guaranteed liability for the above loan, and acquired property profits equivalent to the same amount.

The Defendant, “2014 high-class 94555,” created a valve from G to a person who operated G, and supplied a valve to the F with the head of H’s division, and was not paid wages to the employees, and since April 20, 2014, G’s work was suspended due to his/her employees’ failure to work, and his/her employees claimed the wages of the Defendant and demanded the collection of the office and the Defendant’s office.

F’s personnel I and H brought a valve at ordinary times around 11:45 on May 8, 2014, such as ordinary times, but it prevents G employees from bringing about a valve.

arrow