A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

A seized grandchild (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On October 15, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. in the Daejeon District Court Seosan Branch on October 15, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on November 11, 201.

1. On November 26, 201, at the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant: (a) ordered the victim D to provide alcohol and food, but the Defendant did not pay the price; (b) the victim’s wife F refused to provide the Defendant with drinking and food; (c) the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to the above F while smoking the disturbance; (d) the Defendant displayed the victim’s door to the right part on the right part of the horse; and (e) expressed the consumer’s door to the door of the arms and the door of the arms, and thereby, interfered with the victim’s restaurant’s business operation by force for about 30 minutes in the above restaurant, such as threatening the victim D to “I wish to know.”

2. At around 14:09 on February 14, 2012, the Defendant of special obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) was prepared in the G Office in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, for the supply of and demand for basic living expenses paid by the Government, and for the payment of electric wheelchairs without compensation; (b) the Defendant was able to fluorize complaints; (c) the Defendant prepared dangerous articles (15 cm in length, 25 cm in total length, and No. 1) and fluences in advance at the newspaper; and (d) the Defendant was able to see “YY” and fluort the partitions installed next to the book where the head of the division who is a public official belonging to G (54 cm in length) is seated and fluored two times in front; and (d) the Defendant was able to fluort the column attached to the same public official, who is a public official belonging to I (30 cm in age).

As a result, the Defendant carried with him the above Bags, which are dangerous goods, and obstructed the legitimate performance of official duties in relation to the administrative affairs of G employees who are public officials by avoiding disturbance for about five minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H, J, I, K, and D;

1. Seizure records;

1. On-site and on-site;