logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.07.17 2014고단1718
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 22, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. at the Ulsan District Court on August 9, 2012 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ulsan Detention Center.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 2, 2014, around April 15:40, 2014, the Defendant had difficulty in performance of official duties, such as spiting down spits on the floor, etc., within the Dong community service center of Ulsan-gu Office D, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, where the supply and demand of basic living benefits the Defendant received is reduced.

The Defendant continued to cast melting melting the instant instant World Cup to E, who is a public official of Grade 7 who belongs to the above community service center, for the purpose of his/her own petition, “I am sing, sing to sing to sing to sing to sing to sing to sing to sing to sing to sing to sing to sing to e.

Accordingly, the Defendant abused E and interfered with legitimate performance of official duties concerning civil petitions and administrative affairs.

2. On June 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 12:10 on June 3, 2014, committed an act of obstructing performance of official duties; (b) around 12:10, the Defendant stated that he did not receive rental housing support; (c) stated that he was a public official of Grade VII (35 years of age) who is a public official of Grade VII belonging to the said community service center; (d) took a bath to a civil petitioner on his name who was talking with F; (c) took the head of F to his own head; and (d) f was f was f was bread with the chest and f was bread with the head of F when she was sold, and then f was f was bread with the head of F with his hand, and f was bread with the bat.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted F to interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning F's civil petitions and administrative affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by each prosecutor's office with respect to F;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. Each investigation report (a report accompanied by a copy of the patrol box);

1. Previous records: Application of a reply to criminal records and investigation reports (report attached to a copy of the judgment) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment

arrow