beta
Text
Defendant
A, B, and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.
However, as to Defendant A, the same shall apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant A, on June 24, 2011, who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Suwon District Court for fraud, and on July 2, 2011, on which the judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant C is a loan broker, and Defendant B is a personal worker.
1. Around February 2009, Defendant C and B requested that a financial company could not obtain a credit loan, even if there was no particular property or a certain place of work, and they could not obtain a credit loan from the financial company, and the financial company could not obtain the loan. Defendant C and Defendant B knowingly introduced Defendant C to Defendant C, a loan broker, with the knowledge of these circumstances. Defendant C and Defendant B conspired to obtain a loan by arbitrarily preparing relevant documents as if they were employees of H even though they did not have a certain place of work, and by deceiving the financial company using them.
Defendant B, around April 15, 2009, notified Defendant B of his resident registration number, address, etc. to Defendant C of his resident registration number, etc., Defendant C of his personal information delivered as above at the time of announcement, Defendant C of the personal information of Defendant B, at a place where the address is unknown, Defendant B’s personal information of Defendant B and the representative director of H Co., Ltd, using a computer, verified that Defendant B had been a director at H Co., Ltd.’s Business Management Team from June 1, 2007 to H Co., Ltd.’s Business Management Team, and printed out the seal and arbitrarily affixed the seal of H Co., Ltd., and affixed it to Defendant B’s personal information on the receipt for tax withholding, and from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2008, he voluntarily printed out the seal and paid KRW 56,74,800 to Defendant B.
Accordingly, the Defendants are not authorized for the purpose of exercising their names in collusion with the false names.