A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

17 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was asked by the Seoul Viewing Officer to exercise influence on the company that applied by the representative G of F Professional School around August 2014 to be selected as the entrusted company of H Education Center, while forming a pro-friendly relationship by becoming aware of E around the spring of 2014.

On October 19, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 5 million in cash from E, along with a request from E to the effect that “to be selected as an entrusted business entity of the H Education Center” within the passenger car of the J coffee shop set in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the Defendant received KRW 17 million in total from E, as shown in the list of crimes, from October 1, 2014 to December 22, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant received KRW 17 million from E under the pretext of solicitation or good offices for the affairs handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. 금융거래 내역서 (E, K), H 교육원 위탁 운영단체 공개 모집 제안서, 2014 H 교육원 위탁운영 제안, 압수된 E 휴대전화 문자 메시지 등 분석⑴, ⑵, ⑸, ⑺, E 휴대전화에 저장된 A의 연락처, J 카페 주변 지도 출력물, E 판결문( 서울 서부지방법원 2016 고단 3745), 각 첨부서류 포함 법령의 적용

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 111 (1) (including attorneys-at-law who choose a sentence) of the Act and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under the latter part of Article 116 of the Additional Collection Attorney Act

1. The Defendant asserted that he received 300,000 won, 200,000 won from E at the time of and at the second time of the annexed crime list Nos. 1, 2, and that the said money was received from E, and received from E, not from the pretext of solicitation for the affairs handled by public officials, but from the response to the fact that the said money well

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the witness E’s legal statement is credibility.