A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant served as the head of the legal office of an attorney-at-law B from August 9, 2010 to January 25, 2013, while the head of the legal office of an attorney-at-law C from December 30, 2013 to December 11, 2014, respectively.

1. On August 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (a) told D, who was investigated by the prosecution on the charge of embezzlement, at a place where it is impossible to identify a place below the Seocho-si in the Seocho-si of 2014, that “A request from the public prosecutor in charge of the charge of the charge of the duties to make him/her take a disposition not to institute a non-prosecution disposition by paying the road to him/her”; and (b) received KRW 3 million in cash from D on the top of the F in front of the Republic of Korea located in the Southern-si, Southern-gu, Chungcheongnam-si.

As a result, the defendant received 300,000 won under the pretext of solicitation or good offices for cases or affairs handled by public officials.

2. On October 2014, the Defendant received KRW 4 million from G to H bank account (I) in the Defendant’s name around October 8, 2014, a total of KRW 2.5 million from the Defendant’s wife’s K bank account (L) around the 14th day of the same month, by saying, “The Defendant was investigated by the prosecution on the charge of embezzlement at a place where it is difficult to identify a place less than at the early Yncheon-si (hereinafter referred to as “Scheon-si”) and received KRW 6.5 million from G to the Defendant’s wife account (L) in the name of the Defendant’s wife around October 8, 2014.

As a result, the defendant received 6.5 million won under the pretext of solicitation or good offices for cases or affairs handled by public officials.

3. On December 31, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 3 million from the H bank account (N) account in the name of the Defendant’s wife around December 31, 2014, to the said G’s partner M at a place where it is difficult to know the location below the Y-si around 2014.

As a result, the defendant received 300,000 won under the pretext of solicitation or good offices for cases or affairs handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1.O.