Defendant 1 and one other

The minimum leather (prosecution) and the formal trial

Law Firm Lee & Lee, et al.

Defendant 1 shall be punished by imprisonment for two years and by imprisonment for three years, respectively.

The seized evidence Nos. 1 through 141 (Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office No. 2360) shall be confiscated from Defendant 1, and the seized evidence Nos. 1 through 251 (Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office No. 2767 of 2013) from Defendant 2 shall be confiscated, respectively.

Of the facts charged against the Defendants, the Defendants’ fraud by using computers, etc. related to the sale of each package container listed in the separate sheet of crime (1-2) shall be acquitted.

[Defendant 1, 2013 Highest 4451]

피고인 1은 2009. 11.부터 게임머니 또는 게임아이템을 사고팔아 이익을 남기는 게임머니 등 환전을 업으로 하는 사람으로, 타인 명의의 휴대전화 유심카드를 매입하는 유심업자인 피고인 2(일명 ’울산 ◎사장‘)로부터 타인 명의의 휴대폰과 유심칩을 넘겨받아 그 휴대폰 유심칩으로 소액결제를 하여 캐쉬를 충전하거나 피고인 2로부터 캐쉬가 충전된 타인 명의의 ○○(인터넷주소 생략) 아이디와 비밀번호를 넘겨받아 ○○의 게임 사이트 ’△△△△△△‘ 등에서 게임아이템을 사고팔아 그 이익금을 나누어 가지기로 위 피고인 2 등과 공모하였다.

1. Computer, etc. fraud;

At around 14:40 on September 19, 2012, the Defendant, at the home of the Defendant located in the Cheongju-si ( Address 2 omitted), prepared three computer units and one set of Nowon-gu, etc., and around that time, Defendant 2, the core business operator of the Sinju-si, entered the game in which he was charged for capital from Defendant 2, and the information on the cell phone subscriber Nonindicted 1, and the cell phone number (port phone number omitted) “the core chip in which he was stored,” and connected the game provided on the Internet site ○○ (Internet address omitted) using the above Adi and genetic chip, and connected the game with Nonindicted 1, the subscriber of the above cell phone number, as if Nonindicted 1 purchased the game items, and then selected the purchase box of the product settlement column, and then entered the product distribution number of Nonindicted 1 as a mobile phone, so that he/she acquired the aforementioned 100 won certification number as a mobile phone, and entered the game item at least 100 won.

In addition, from November 23, 2009 to March 1, 2013, the Defendant acquired a total of KRW 125,678,400, in total, 1257 times, as shown in attached Table 2013 Highest 4451 Crime List 1-1) (1-1).

As a result, the defendant acquired economic benefits by entering false information or improper orders in a computer or other information processing device in collusion with the defendant 2, etc., or by inputting information without authority.

2. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information.

No one shall knowingly receive any divulged personal information for profit or for any other wrongful purpose.

Nevertheless, on November 2009, Defendant 1 received personal information, such as the ID and password, from the Defendant’s house located in the territory of the Sinju-si ( Address 2 omitted), from another person in the name of another person, and received personal information, such as the Defendant’s ID and password, from the Defendant 2, who was the core business operator, to sell the accident of the game items in another person’s name, Defendant 1 received personal information, such as Nonindicted 9’s ○○○ (Adi 2 omitted), and the password, through the Defendant’s Internet Rabling and Ma.

In addition, the Defendant received personal information from the above date to August 2012, 2016 in total 996 by the aforementioned method as indicated in the crime sight table (2).

Accordingly, the Defendant knew of the divulged personal information, received the personal information for profit or for an unlawful purpose.

3. Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

No one shall exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products as a business.

Nevertheless, at around 09:54 on December 24, 2009, Defendant 1 advertised to sell game items at a low price in the online game “△△△△△△△△,” which was acquired in the same manner as the above paragraph (1) at the Defendant’s house located in Cheongju-si, a considerable amount of 09:54, Cheongju-si, which was located in Cheongju-si ( Address 2 omitted). After advertising to sell the game items at a low price, Defendant 1 sent the said game items to Nonindicted 2, who reported and contacted the advertisement, and received 50,000 won in return.

In addition, between November 1, 2009 and June 8, 2013, the Defendant purchased game items equivalent to KRW 8,201,40,00 in total on 96 occasions, as shown in [Attachment 2013da4451 (5), and (7), as indicated in [Attachment 2013da4451 (3), (4), and (6), and sold game items in total 5,848 times in total.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above defendant 2, exchanged, arranged for exchange or repurchase of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

4. Violation of the Act on the Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment.

From February 3, 2010 to May 7, 2013, Defendant 1 deposited KRW 1360,000 in the National Bank Account (Account Number 5 omitted) in the name of the Defendant in the name of Non-Indicted 10, as indicated in the [Attachment 2013No. 451 Crime List (8)] between the above date and the above date, Defendant’s female member bank account (Account Number 4 omitted), Defendant’s account in the name of Non-Indicted 10, Non-Indicted 11 (Account Number 6 omitted), Defendant’s account in the name of Non-Indicted 10, Non-Indicted 11 (Account Number 6 omitted), Defendant’s parent bank account in the name of Non-Indicted 12 (Account Number 4 omitted), and Defendant’s account number in the name of Non-Indicted 12 (Account Number 157, 157, 157).

In this respect, the defendant pretended that the acquisition or disposition of criminal proceeds is true.

[Defendant 2, 2013 Highest 488]

1. Defendant 1 and co-principal;

피고인 2는 2009. 1.경부터 일체불상의 ◇사장 등으로부터 대출 등을 빙자하여 불법으로 개통된 타인 명의의 유심칩이 내장된 휴대폰 및 불법으로 캐쉬가 충전된 타인 명의의 ○○(인터넷주소 생략) 등의 아이디를 구입하여 이를 피고인 1에게 넘겨 피고인 1로 하여금 넘겨받은 휴대폰 유심칩을 이용하여 소액결제를 하여 캐쉬를 충전하거나 캐쉬가 충전된 타인 명의의 아이디를 이용하여 ○○의 △△△△△△ 등의 게임사이트에 접속하여 게임아이템을 구입하여 인터넷에서 이를 직접 거래하거나 게임아이템 중개사이트인 □□□□□ 등에서 이를 매매하여 그 이익금을 나누기로 피고인 1과 공모하였다.

(a) Fraud by using computers, etc.;

피고인 2는 2012. 9.경 울산 남구 (주소 1 생략)에 있는 피고인의 집에서, 위 ◇사장 등으로부터 구입한 캐쉬가 충전된 아이디 및 유심칩이 내장된 휴대폰을 이메일, 고속버스 수하물 편으로 청주시에 있는 피고인 1에게 건네주고, 피고인 1은 2012. 9. 19. 청주시 상당구 (주소 2 생략)에 있는 피고인 1의 집에서 피고인으로부터 건네받은 캐쉬가 충전된 아이디 ‘(아이디 1 생략)'과 휴대전화 가입자 공소외 1에 대한 정보와 휴대전화 번호 (휴대전화번호 생략)이 저장된 유심칩을 건네받은 후 위 아이디와 유심칩을 이용하여 인터넷사이트 ○○에서 제공하는 게임에 접속하여 마치 위 휴대전화 번호의 가입자 공소외 1이 게임아이템을 구매하는 것처럼 100,000원의 게임아이템 구매를 선택한 후 상품결제란의 구매버튼을 클릭하여 공소외 1의 유심침이 내장된 휴대폰으로 인증번호가 전송되도록 하고, 위 인증번호를 입력하는 방법으로 100,000원 상당의 게임아이템을 취득한 것을 비롯하여 2009. 11. 23.경부터 2013. 3. 1.경까지 사이에 별지 2013고단4451 범죄일람표 주2) (1-1) 와 같이 위와 같은 방법으로 총 1,857회에 걸쳐 합계 125,678,400원 상당의 재산상 이익을 취득하였다.

In collusion with the above defendant 1, the defendant acquired economic benefits by making data processed by inputting false information or improper order into a computer or other information processing device or inputting information without authority.

(b) Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

No one shall exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products as a business.

Nevertheless, Defendant 2: (a) placed an advertisement with Defendant 1’s cell phone with an e-mail and high-speed bus baggage e-mail filled with a carsh as above; and (b) placed an advertisement with the intent to sell game items at a low price in the online game “△△△△△△△△△△△” online at the home of the above Defendant 1, which was located in the Cheongju-si on December 24, 2009, by linking the said Defendant 1’s game item transaction brokerage site, to △△△△△△△△△△△△△; and (c) placed an advertisement with the said contents to sell them at a low price; and (d) received 50,000 won in return for the delivery of the said game items in the way of referred to as “donation” from November 1, 2009 to June 8, 2013; and (d) purchased the said items in the aggregate of KRW 4888(3),4858(4) and 48508(458(1).7858).28).2888).2,7857.47.2.208.2.2.47.208

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above defendant 1, exchanged, arranged for exchange or repurchase of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

2. Defendant 2’s sole criminal conduct

(a) Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information;

No one shall knowingly receive any divulged personal information for profit or for any other wrongful purpose.

그럼에도 피고인 2는 2010. 12. 초순경 울산시 남구 (주소 1 생략)에 있는 피고인의 집에서, 캐쉬가 충전된 타인 명의의 아이디와 비밀번호 등 개인정보를 제공받아 타인 명의로 게임아이템을 사고팔기 위해 일명 ◇사장으로부터 공소외 16의 ○○ 아이디 ‘(아이디 3 생략)’, 주민등록번호 ‘(주민등록번호 생략)’ 등 개인정보를 피고인의 이메일을 통해 제공받은 것을 비롯하여 2012. 7.경까지 사이에 별지 2013고단4888 범죄일람표(2) 기재와 같이 같은 방법으로 3,064명에 대한 개인정보를 제공받았다.

Accordingly, the Defendant knew of the divulged personal information, received the personal information for profit or for an unlawful purpose.

(b) Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

No one shall exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products as a business.

Nevertheless, on May 16, 2010, at the defendant's house located in the Nam-gu ( Address 1 omitted) Nam-gu, Ulsan-si, Inc., Defendant 2: (a) accessed the game item item brokerage site, and placed an advertisement on the mobile phone in the name of another person or the mobile phone in the name of another person, which was filled with the previous car, from a third party, to sell an online game item, which was obtained by accessing the website under the name of another person; and (b) was transferred KRW 22,800 in return, by sending the said game item to Nonindicted 3 by means of "futures-gu," which was referred to as "futures-gu, the advertisement was reported," and received money in return.

In addition, between November 1, 2009 and June 8, 2013, the Defendant sold game items equivalent to KRW 2,431,193,782 note 5) by means of using another person’s name as above, and purchased game items in total amount of KRW 818,574,360 won over 914 times in total, as described in attached Table 2013,578 (8), (11), and (12).

As a result, the defendant was engaged in exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchaseing tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

C. Violation of the Act on the Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment

Defendant 2, at the above Defendant’s office on January 3, 2009, transferred KRW 865,00 to the Agricultural Cooperative account (Account Number 1 omitted) in the name of Nonindicted 4, the Defendant’s spouse, in order to conceal criminal proceeds, as above, and received KRW 865,00 from that time during the period from that time until June 28, 2013, as stated in attached Table 2013-Ma488, (8-2), (8-3, (8-1), (8-2, (8-1), (8-1), (8-2-1), (8-3-1), and (8-3-1), the Defendant’s spouse’s account in the name of Nonindicted 4 (Account Number 1 omitted), national bank account (Account Number 2 omitted), and KRW 1,925,205,6325,6325,6325,305, in total from that time to June 28, 2013.

In this respect, the defendant pretended that the acquisition or disposition of criminal proceeds is true.

【2013 Highest 4451】

1. The legal statement of Defendant 1

1. Each prosecutor and police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The prosecutor’s statement concerning Nonindicted 13

1. Each police statement made against Nonindicted 9 and 10

1. Seizure records;

1. A copy, etc. of the details of each user's information inquiry (No. 6 and 9), a bus list (No. 22), a copy of the resident registration certificate (Evidence No. 23), a personal financial transaction (Evidence No. 26), a DNA chip list, etc. (Evidence No. 27), a list of core chips (Evidence No. 28), personal information details, etc. (Evidence No. 29), personal information details, etc. (Evidence No. 31), ○○ (Evidence No. 32), a list of personal information (Evidence No. 32), a list of items (Evidence No. 38), a specification of items, etc. (Evidence No. 46);

1. Investigation report (24 No. 24 of the evidence list, such as the scene of search and seizure);

[2013 Highest 4888]

1. Defendant 2’s legal statement

1. Each prosecutor's office and police interrogation protocol against Defendant 2 (including the part concerning Defendant 1's offense);

1. Seizure records;

1. Data on replies to warrants (No. 14);

1. 수사보고(피의자 소액결제시 사용한 아이디 관련, 증거목록 2번), 수사보고(피의자가 울산 ◎사장으로부터 제공받은 개인정보 내역 등, 증거목록 3번), 수사보고(범행계좌 거래내역 중 '울산‘ 출금 내역, 증거목록 7번), 수사보고(범죄일람표 작성 근거가 된 통장거래내역 첨부, 증거목록 제15번), 수사보고(환전업자인 사건외 공소외 14와 피의자와 관계, 증거목록 제20번), 수사보고(압수수색검증영장 집행 및 피의자 체포관련, 증거목록 27번), 수사보고(피고인 1과 피의자가 통화내역, 증거목록 28번), 수사보고(피의자와 환전업자인 피고인 1, 공소외 14 간의 계좌 거래 내역, 증거목록 29번), 수사보고{사건외 공소외 14의 범죄일람표(3)에 울산캐쉬(피고인 2)관련, 증거목록 30번}, 수사보고(피의자의 ◈◈ 이메일 내용 확인, 증거목록 32번), 수사보고{환전업자 사건외 공소외 14(일명 ▷▷)에 대한 추가조사, 증거목록 40번}, 수사보고(피의자 피고인 2의 아이템 중개사이트를 이용한 환전행위 관련, 증거목록 41번), 수사보고(개인정보 불법취득 내역1 - ♤♤ 받은 메일함 2, 증거목록 43번), 수사보고(피의자 사용한 (이메일 주소 생략)의 발신내역의 이 사건 관련성, 증거목록 44번), 수사보고(개인정보 불법취득 내역2 - ♤♤ 받은 메일함 2, 증거목록 46번)

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant 1: Articles 347-2 and 30 (a point of fraud by Use of Computer, etc.), subparagraph 6 of Article 71, Article 28-2 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (the point of receipt of divulged personal information), Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 of the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of receipt of divulged personal information), Article 3(1)1 of the Act on Regulation and Punishment, etc. of Concealment of Criminal Proceeds (the point of concealment of criminal proceeds)

(b) Defendant 2: Articles 347-2 and 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of a fraud by using computers, etc.), Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Promotion of the Game Industry Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of a joint crime by exchanging items), Article 71 Subparag. 6 and Article 28-2(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 (the point of receipt of leaked personal information), Article 3(1)1 of the Act on Regulation and Punishment, etc. of Concealment of Criminal Proceeds (the point of concealment of criminal proceeds)

1. Selection of punishment;

Defendants: Imprisonment Decision

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes;

Defendants: former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Confiscation;

Defendants: Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act

1. As to the joint crime such as fraud by use of computers, etc. and violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act

Defendant 2’s defense counsel asserts to the effect that there was no conspiracy between Defendant 2 and Defendant 1 on each of the above crimes.

In the case of co-offenders who jointly process two or more criminal acts, the conspiracy does not require any legal punishment, but is only a combination of intent to realize a crime by combining two or more persons in a certain crime. Although there was no conspiracy process, if there was a combination of intent to conduct the crime in order or impliedly, the conspiracy relationship is established between several persons. Even if there was no conspiracy, even if there was no direct participation in the conduct, even if there was a person directly involved in the conduct, he/she is liable for the other conspiracy's act as a co-principal, and the joint execution of the crime by conspiracy is not premised on the fulfillment of the elements of the crime by all accomplices, but can also be decided by comprehensively taking into account the degree of understanding of the result of the act, the size of participation in the act, and the intent to control the crime (see Supreme Court Decision 2008Do111, Apr. 11, 2008).

이 사건에 관하여 보건대, 앞서 거시한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음의 각 사정, 즉 피고인 2는 2009년경 일명 “◇사장” 등 상선의 유심업자 등로부터 유심칩이 장착된 핸드폰, 핸드폰 명의자의 이름과 주민등록번호 또는 캐쉬가 충전된 타인의 아이디 등을 구하여 게임아이템 등을 구매하고, 구매한 게임 아이템 등을 다시 피고인 1에게 판매하여왔던 점, 이후 피고인 2는 피고인 1로부터 좀 더 많은 양의 아이템을 구입할 수 있느냐고 요청을 받고 피고인 1에게 게임아이템을 대량으로 판매하다가 2010. 6.경부터는 피고인 1에게 캐쉬가 충전된 아이디 자체를 넘겨주거나 유심칩을 이용하여 소액결제를 하는 방법을 피고인 1에게 알려주고 유심칩이 장착된 핸드폰 등을 피고인 1에게 매도하기 시작한 점, 당시 피고인 2는 피고인 1이 게임아이템 등을 구매하기 위하여 타인의 계정 또는 유심칩 등을 불법적으로 사용할 것을 알면서도 일명 “◇사장” 등 상선의 유심업자 등로부터 유심칩이 장착된 핸드폰, 핸드폰 명의자의 이름과 주민등록번호 또는 캐쉬가 충전된 타인의 아이디 등을 구하여 피고인 1에게 판매한 점, 또한 피고인 2는 피고인 1에게 유심칩을 이용한 캐쉬 충전시 주의할 내용, 특히 사용한 유심칩 등은 폐기할 것을 알려주었고, 피고인 1과 사전에 대금을 정하여 놓은 다음 피고인 1이 게임 아이템 등을 판매한 이후 그 대금을 지급받아왔기 때문에( 2013고단4888 증거기록 2180쪽) 피고인 1의 게임 아이템 처분 여부 등을 알고 있었던 것으로 보이는 점 등을 종합하여 보면, 피고인 2는 피고인 1과 공모하여 이 사건 컴퓨터등사용사기죄 및 게임산업진흥에관한법률위반죄에 관하여 실행행위를 분담한 것으로 봄이 상당하므로, 피고인 변호인의 주장은 받아들이지 아니한다.

2. On the violation of Information and Communications Network Utilization Promotion Act

The Defendants’ defense counsel asserts to the effect that, in case where information about the same person is transferred several times, the infringement of legal interests by each victim is recognized, so the overlapping part of information about the same person constitutes double prosecution.

Article 28-2 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. provides that no person shall be provided with personal information for profit or for any other unlawful purpose with knowledge of the divulgence of user's personal information. Article 2 (1) 6 of the same Act provides that "personal information" means information about an individual who is alive, such as a code, letter, voice, sound, image, etc. which can identify a specific individual by his/her name, resident registration number, etc. (if the information alone cannot identify a specific individual but can be combined with other information easily, such information shall be included). Even if the same personal information is provided to the same person several times, if the date of provision is provided differently, the above crime shall be established individually, and even if the same person is the same, if the account of the Internet site is different, that is, if the ID and password are different, it shall be deemed that the provision of new personal information constitutes a separate crime. Accordingly, the defendants' assertion on other premise is difficult to accept.

3. As to a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act

A. Determination on Defendant 1’s assertion

Defendant 1’s defense counsel asserts that game items acquired by the method of “purchase” using chips filled by the Defendant does not constitute “the tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products” as provided in Article 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act.

Article 32 (1) 7 of the Enforcement Decree of the Game Industry Promotion Act provides that "No one shall engage in money or exchange or repurchase of game products with points, virtual currency used in the game industry, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, or any other similar game product for the purpose of acquiring such games by using the same game item" (hereinafter referred to as "game money prescribed by Presidential Decree". However, with respect to "game money prescribed by Presidential Decree and things similar thereto" as mentioned in Article 18-3 (6) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, such as game money and tools for acquiring games by using the same method as the aforesaid game item, or by using the same method as those of another person's game item, or by using the same method as those of another person's game item, or by producing or exchanging data (hereinafter the same shall apply). It refers to 3. Game money or tools for producing or exchanging such game products by producing or exchanging data (such as game money or tools used in lieu of the above game item)."

B. Determination on Defendant 2’s assertion

Defendant 2’s defense counsel asserts to the effect that Defendant 2 purchased and resells game items by personally using an Internet brokerage site, etc. with regard to the violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry as stated in Article 2-b of the Criminal facts [Defendant 2, 2013 Highest 488] of the judgment, Defendant 2’s act up to July 19, 2012, which was prior to the amendment of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, does not constitute a criminal act as stipulated in the above Act.

Defendant 2 stated in an investigative agency that “It is institutionalized in order to prevent a large number of transactions, on the basis of a policy-based basis, by using a third party’s name.” Defendant 2 made a transaction using a third party’s ID in the name of a third party because it is not good if a transaction was conducted by using a third party’s chip or a chip filled with a third party’s chip” (Evidence No. 2185 pages). Defendant 2 stated that “The purchase of a third party’s game item after purchasing it by using a third party’s chip or chip with a third party’s chip” (Evidence No. 3253 pages of evidence records). Defendant 2 appears to have obtained a copy or driver’s license of another person’s resident registration certificate during the period of crime, and Defendant 1 appears to have been illegally purchased by using the third party’s chip or chip with a third party’s chip that it appears to have been necessary for Defendant 1, 14, or 15.

4. Violation of the Act on the Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment.

Defendant 1 asserts to the effect that Defendant 2 did not have any awareness or intent to conceal criminal proceeds because he believed that the act of exchanging game items was lawful for the smooth sale of game items.

Article 3(1)1 of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment (hereinafter “Criminal Proceeds Regulation Act”) is punishable. Such an act may include the act of pretending that criminal proceeds, etc. belong to a third party, such as depositing criminal proceeds into an account held in another person’s name (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do1004, Feb. 28, 2008). In light of the following: (a) all the circumstances acknowledged by the foregoing evidence; (b) in particular, the Defendants’ act of obtaining criminal proceeds, etc., under the premise that the game from a person on the site of an item, such as Ma○○ Mal Ma and ▽▽▽▽▽▽▽△△, would escape the sales restriction system that prohibits him from selling a large amount or item; and (c) the Defendants’ act of hidinging criminal proceeds, etc. to make a normal transaction of a game item, and at least the Defendants’ act of acquiring or concealing criminal proceeds, etc., in light of the fact that the game item’s act constitutes one’s own act of acquisition or concealment, etc.

Defendant 1 had no favorable circumstances, such as the fact that Defendant 1 had no criminal power at all, and Defendant 2 did not have any criminal power exceeding fine. However, the Defendants committed repeated fraud against the unspecified and multiple victims for a considerable period of three years by illegally using the unlawful use of other’s personal information, such as handphones, Handphones in the name of another, and gys, and other persons’ personal information, and by purchasing and selling game items, etc., and the damage is not completely recovered. Nevertheless, the Defendants do not seem to have a serious reflectness until now. In particular, in the case of Defendant 2, considering unfavorable circumstances such as Defendant 1’s participation in the crime and spreading the crime, it is inevitable to sentence sentence against the Defendants. In full view of the other Defendants’ age, character and conduct, family relations, motive and circumstances after the crime, degree of participation in the crime and role after the crime, the degree of participation in the crime of this case’s crime, etc., the Defendants should be determined by the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry, and the amount of additional collection should not be determined separately.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendants’ co-offenders - Defendant’s use of a computer, etc. related to the 2013 Highest 4451, 2013 Highest 488

피고인 2는 2009. 1.경부터 일체불상의 ◇사장 등으로부터 대출 등을 빙자하여 불법으로 개통된 타인 명의의 유심칩이 내장된 휴대폰 및 불법으로 캐쉬가 충전된 타인 명의의 ○○(인터넷주소 생략) 등의 아이디를 구입하여 이를 피고인 1에게 넘기고, 피고인 1은 2009. 11.부터 게임머니 또는 게임아이템을 사고팔아 이익을 남기는 게임머니 등 환전을 업으로 하는 사람으로, 피고인 2로부터 타인 명의의 휴대폰과 유심칩을 넘겨받아 그 휴대폰 유심칩을 이용하여 소액결제를 하여 캐쉬를 충전하거나 캐쉬가 충전된 타인 명의의 ○○ 아이디와 비밀번호를 넘겨받아 ○○의 게임 사이트 ’△△△△△△‘ 등에 접속하여 게임아이템을 구입하여 인터넷에서 이를 직접 거래하거나 게임 아이템 중개사이트인 □□□□□ 등에서 이를 사고팔아 그 이익금을 나누어 가지기로 상호 공모하였다.

피고인 2는 2012. 9.경 울산 남구 (주소 1 생략)에 있는 피고인의 집에서 위 ◇사장 등으로부터 구입한 캐쉬가 충전된 아이디 및 유심침이 내장된 휴대폰을 통하여 기트프콘 등을 구입하여 이메일, 고속버스 수하물 편으로 청주시에 있는 피고인 1에게 건네주고, 피고인 1은 2010. 5. 30. 청주시 상당구 (주소 2 생략)에 있는 자신의 집에서, 피고인 2로부터 건네받은 기프트콘 일련번호 또는 캐쉬가 충전된 아이디와 휴대전화 가입자에 대한 정보, 휴대전화번호 등이 저장된 유심칩을 이용하여 기프트콘 등을 구입하여 얻은 기프트콘의 일련번호를 자신의 여자친구인 공소외 13을 통하여 인터넷 중고거래사이트에서 마치 정상적으로 구입한 기프트콘으로 속여 타인에게 매매하는 것을 비롯하여 2010. 5. 30.부터 2013. 1. 5.까지 별지 2013고단4451 범죄일람표(1-2) 기재와 같이 위와 같은 방법으로 총 233회에 걸쳐 합계 213,129,602원 상당의 재산상 이익을 취득하였다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to enter false information or improper orders into computer or other information processing devices, or input information without authority, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits.

B. Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act among the sole crimes committed by Defendant 2

No one shall exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products as a business.

Nevertheless, on October 21, 2009, Defendant 2, at the Defendant’s house located in Ulsan-gu ( Address 1 omitted), located in Ulsan-si, ( Address 1 omitted), advertised that he would sell game items at low prices, and sold the said game items to Nonindicted 6, who reported and contacted the advertisement, by means of a referring to “futures” and received 300,000 won in return from January 4, 2009 to January 29, 2013 as well as receiving 300,000 won in return from January 4, 2009 to January 29, 2013 as indicated in attached Table 217, such as the Game item trading list (8-1-1), (8-21), (8-21), and (8-3-1), and (8-3-1).

As a result, the defendant was engaged in exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchaseing tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

2. Determination and conclusion

A. As to the Defendants’ fraud by using the computer, etc. related to the sale of the package containers

살피건대, 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음의 각 사정, 즉 기프트콘은 휴대폰 문자메시지로 전송되는 바코드 형태의 온라인 선물 쿠폰으로, 기프트콘을 구입한 사람이 기프트콘을 상대방에게 보내주면 이를 받은 사람이 매장에서 실제 상품 또는 서비스를 제공받을 수 있는 쿠폰인 점, 피고인 1은 피고인 2로부터 기프트콘의 일련번호를 이메일을 통하여 송부받고, 이를 다시 판매한 뒤 정가의 60%에 해당하는 금액을 피고인 2에게 송금하여 주었을 뿐 피고인 1이 직접 기프트콘을 유심칩 등을 이용하여 소액결제의 방법으로 취득한 것으로 보이지는 않는 점, 피고인 1은 피고인 2가 불법하게 취득한 타인의 계정 또는 유심칩을 이용하여 기프트콘을 구매한 것으로 보인다고 진술하였으나, 이는 추측에 불과하고 구체적으로 확인한 바는 없는 점, 피고인 2는 수사기관에서부터 일관되게 기프트콘은 대전 ◇사장의 친동생이라는 사람으로부터 이메일을 통하여 전자쿠폰을 넘겨받는 형식으로 구입하였다고 진술하고 있을 뿐, 피고인 2가 직접 유심칩 등을 이용하여 소액결제 등의 방법을 통하여 기프트콘을 구입하거나 취득하였다는 점에 관하여는 이를 인정할 증거가 전혀 없는 점, 그렇다면 피고인들이 매도한 별지 2013고단4451 범죄일람표 (1-2) 기재 각 기프트콘의 최초 취득 경위가 명확하지 아니하고 오히려 불법적인 방법으로 취득된 것으로 보인다고 하더라도, 피고인들이 제3자로부터 이를 구입하여 재판매한 행위 자체는 이미 컴퓨터등사용사기행위로서 이루어진 취득행위의 사후조처에 불과하여 새로운 법익의 침해를 수반하지 않는 이른바 불가벌적 사후행위에 해당한다고 보이는 점 등을 종합하여 보면, 피고인들의 기프트콘 취득 및 재판매 행위는 별도의 컴퓨터등사용사기죄에 해당한다고 보이지 아니하므로, 검사가 제출한 증거들만으로는 이 부분 공소사실을 컴퓨터등사용사기죄로 인정하기에 부족하고, 달리 이를 인정할 증거가 없다.

Therefore, the facts charged against the Defendants constitute a case where there is no proof of crime and thus, the judgment of innocence shall be rendered under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

B. As to Defendant 2’s assertion of double inclusion of Nonindicted 6, 7, and 8 deposits in [Attachment 2013 Highest 4888 List of Offenses (8]

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by this court’s duly adopted and investigated evidence, Defendant 2: (a) was not guilty on Nonindicted 6’s account in the name of Nonindicted 8, 7, and Nonindicted 6’s account under the name of Nonindicted 6, 7, and Nonindicted 8-1, which were recorded on the [Attachment 6] list 2013 high 48 high 48 crime; and (b) Nonindicted 6, 7, and Nonindicted 8-1, which were recorded on the [Attachment 6] list in the [Attachment 8] and the [Attachment 6] list; (c) Nonindicted 8-1, which were recorded on the [Attachment 6] list in the name of Nonindicted 4, 7, and 8-1, which were recorded on the [Attachment 6] list; and (d) which were recorded on the [Attachment 6] list in the name of Nonindicted 6, Defendant 2, who was not found guilty; and (d) the part of the [Attachment 6] list in the name of Nonindicted 4, Defendant’s mother 5, and 28-18-18-1.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

[Attachment Form 5]

Judges Shin Jae-hee

Note 1) It is limited to the remaining part of the list of crimes (1) [Attachment 2013 Highest 488 Case List (1)] attached to the indictment, except the list of crimes (1-2) in relation to the part of the sale of cryp containers.

Note 2) It is limited to the remainder other than the attached Form 2013 Highest 4451 Criminal List (1-2) relating to the part of the sale of meat containers in attached Table 2013 Highest 488 Criminal List (1).

3) The remainder except the list of crimes (8-1-1), list of crimes (8-2-1), list of crimes (8-2-1), and list of crimes (8-3-1) attached to the indictment.

4) In the list of crimes (8-1-1), list of crimes (8-2-1), list of crimes (8-2-1), and list of crimes (8-3-1) attached to the indictment, the remainder after the total of 217 times.

Note 5) The remainder, with the exception of the sum total of KRW 75,638,400 in the crime sight table (8-1), the crime sight table (8-2-1), and the crime sight table (8-3-1), attached to the indictment (8).