logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고단695
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant asked and asked to get a loan to the name brobeer, and then, if the above loan bromoer forges the Defendant’s earned income collection receipt, etc., then the Defendant shared the role by submitting it to the financial institution in accordance with the instructions of the lending bromoer, and conspired with the above loan bromoer by obtaining the loan bromoer’s loan.

1. On August 2012, 2012, the nameless loan hubker entered “BC” at will in the column for the applicant to receive the source of earned income from the Defendant at a non-permanent location, and entered “B representative director CB” in the column for the issuer of the certificate of employment, and entered “B” in the column for the issuer of the detailed statement of payment, and forged one copy of the source of earned income collection receipt in the name of the stock company B, one of the employment certificate, one of the employment certificate, and one of the detailed statement of payment.

Accordingly, the defendant is stated in the indictment to prove facts in collusion with the name-free loan hub, but it is corrected to be corrected to be a clerical error.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

The author forged the private document on this issue.

2. On September 5, 2012, the Defendant, in collusion with the name-free loan brokers, received and submitted a letter of the source receipt of earned income in the name-free loan in the name of the Defendant, one copy of the employment income collection receipt, one of the employment certificate, one of the employment certificate, and one of the detailed statement of benefits in the name of the stock company B, for which the Defendant applied for a lease loan in the name of the Defendant at the location of Eunpyeong-dong 909-dong 101, Pyeongtaek-dong 22, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul. In addition, the Defendant filed an application for a lease loan in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the name-free loan hub, used private documents to prove forged facts for the purpose of exercising.

3. The Defendant, in collusion with the Defendant’s name-free loan hub, committed by the Victim Nonghyup Bank around September 5, 2012.

arrow