logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.06.17 2016고단338
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection, etc. of Victims (Rape, etc. of Minors under the age of 13) and completed the execution of the sentence on July 15, 2007. On February 11, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. from the Suwon Giwon method Board for a period of ten months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 12, 2009, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 15, 2009.

On June 2008, the Defendant, along with his name broker and his name broker, knew that the Defendant would have been granted a full-time housing loan to an employee under the name of the Defendant and divided the loan, and the name broker prepared a certificate of employment that the Defendant is working for the “C” company, a certificate of source of income tax collection, and a pre-contract that the Defendant has a full-time deposit, and issued a written contract to the Defendant. On July 7, 2008, the Defendant filed an application for a full-time housing loan with the employee in charge of the loan in name at the location of the Han-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public Co., Ltd., Ltd., Han-gu branch office in Mapo-gu, Seoul, for the said certificate of employment, the certificate

However, the defendant did not serve in the above "C", and did not enter into a lease contract, and due to the financial standing of the defendant, there was no intention or ability to repay the loan even if he received the loan.

On July 14, 2008, the Defendant was transferred KRW 30 million to the account in the name of D with loans from a victim Han Bank to a worker deposit account.

As a result, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with his name bromoer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Requesting a person suspected of lending the whole tax amount to investigate;

1. Application for a loan of the National Bookbook, a loan transaction agreement, a credit guarantee agreement, a lease contract, a certificate of lease contract, a deposit account certificate, a certificate of employment, and a certificate of source of income tax;

1. E: 1.1.

arrow