1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 9, 1976, the plaintiff (BB and male) entered the Army and was assigned to the 213th National Cemetery of Bovine Man-si in the 25th National Cemetery of Bovine Man-si on February 7, 1977. On February 26, 197, the plaintiff was diagnosed as "Man-si's Man-si's Man-si's Man-si's Man-si's Man-si's Man-si's Man-si's Man-si's Man-si's Man-si's Man-si's Man-si." On February 105, 197, the plaintiff (B and male) was diagnosed as the "Man-si's Man-si's Man-si

B. In around 193, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “previous application”) with the Defendant, and received a notification from the Defendant on the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “previous disposition”). However, the Plaintiff was judged to have failed to meet the disability rating standards in a new physical examination on the disability classification on May 21, 1993, and was determined to have failed to meet the disability rating standards in a physical examination on the re-verification of the disability rating classification on March 10, 200.

C. On May 13, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State pursuant to the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act”) on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State, on the basis of the filing of the application for “waste farming, hearing, etc.” (hereinafter “the Act”) to the Defendant.

Accordingly, on November 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) did not meet the requirements for soldier or policeman on duty under the Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State; (b) however, it constitutes a soldier or policeman under Article 2(1)2 of the former Act on Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran’s Compensation (amended by Act No. 13608, Dec. 22, 2015; hereinafter “former Act on Persons Eligible for Veteran’s Compensation”); and (c) the third injury did not meet the requirements for a person of distinguished services to the State and the requirements for a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (d) stated that the second injury was not recognized as a person eligible for veteran’s compensation, but the content and content of the instant disposition, etc. were written.