logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.04.09 2014고단365
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From October 18, 2013 to December 2, 2013, the Defendant operated a commercial sex acts in the name of “C” on the second floor B in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, and installed a 30 square meter and a closed studio four in the size of 30 square meters, and employed a female employee D, E, F, and G, and then employed an unspecified male hand who found this place, the Defendant engaged in commercial sex acts by receiving 100,000 won per person from the female hand who received the payment for commercial sex acts and let the female employee have sexual intercourse with the male guest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D, E, and H;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (such as details of control and site conditions);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment (compacting imprisonment with prison labor, with prison labor),

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Punishment of the act of arranging sexual traffic (the average number of customers per day) under Article 25 (39 days (the period of operation) x 6 (the average number of customers per day) x 50,000 won x 1,700,000 won) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. for the punishment of a criminal defendant on October 17, 2013 as a criminal act of the same kind committed by the defendant on October 17, 2013, even though he/she has been issued a summary order, he/she shall not be light of the quality of crimes in light

However, in consideration of various sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the defendant is recognized as committing a crime and reflects, the scale, frequency, etc. of the brokerage of sexual traffic does not focus, and there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine due to the same crime, etc., the punishment as the order shall be determined

arrow