A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of “C” from the 6th floor of Kimpo-si building B.

From June 1, 2014 to July 9, 2014, the Defendant had approximately 50 square meters in the above business establishment, and had 12 square meters in return for sexual traffic from the unspecific male grandchildren who found there, and had them receive 120,000 won in return for sexual traffic, and had them do the similarity act by allowing DNA, etc. who is female employees, to engage in sexual intercourse with his/her hand, or arrange sexual intercourse for the business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Voluntary report;

1. The list of voluntary submission and seizure;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A copy of the real estate lease contract;

1. Details of transactions at the monthly tax passbook; and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports and investigation reports (Attachment to summary orders);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Calculation of the additionally collected amount under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts: 4,680,000 won (i.e., 60,000 won which was earned from arranging commercial sex acts once x 2 days x 39 days) for sentencing of this case in light of the size of the business, operating period, degree of participation of the defendant, etc. of this case, the crime of this case is not less complicated, and the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had been sentenced to a fine for the same crime, is disadvantageous to the

On the other hand, it is favorable to the defendant that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and is in depth divided, and that the business of this case is discontinued and the defendant is willing not to repeat again.

The defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime are imposed.