beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2014 High-level 3347] The defendant is a person who worked at the "D's mobile phone store of the victim C in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City."
1. Larceny;
A. At around 22:00 on April 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by taking one gallon in S4 smartphone in the case of a galloning gallon equivalent to the market value of KRW 890,000 at which the victim was kept in the display stand, which was first left.
B. On April 2, 2014, around 21:00, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of each of the instant smartphones S4 smartphones in galgal lusium equivalent to the total market value of KRW 1,750,00,000, which the victim was kept in the display stand, which was first set aside; and (b) galgal lusium, in gallon
2. Fraud;
A. At around 12:30 on April 5, 2014, the Defendant ordered the victim G, a manager of F, to deliver gallon 5 smartphones, as if the instant D orders were ordered, around the taxi platform in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.
However, the fact was that the defendant was aware of the crime described in Paragraph 1 and the above D was left alone, so even if the mobile phone was delivered under the above D name, there was no intention to pay the price normally.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and then acquired the gallon 1 unit of S5 Smartphone from the victim in the case of galloning that is equivalent to the market value of 840,000 won.
B. At around 17:00 on April 9, 2014, the Defendant ordered the victim I, who was the manager of LG Plus H, to deliver two gallon 3 smartphones, as ordered by the said D, before the taxi platform of the said EM, as the Defendant ordered the victim I to do so.
However, the fact was that the defendant was aware of the crime described in Paragraph 1 and the above D was left alone, so even if the mobile phone was delivered under the above D name, there was no intention to pay the price normally.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and acquired 2,120,000 gallon 3 smartphones from the victim with the total market value of 2,120,000.