logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.07.16 2013고단2825
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 8, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. by the Seoul Northern District Court on November 8, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 16, 2012, and is currently in the grace period.

1. From November 3, 2013, around 19:00 on November 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) up to Escki managed by the victim D in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the Defendant stolen the victim’s surveillance by putting in shopping bags the species he prepared in advance one lavered lavered 1,290 won in total in the market price where the victim’s surveillance was neglected; (b) one laverg 1 disease, one laverg laverg, one laverg laver, and one laver.

2. On November 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 20:43, at the Seoul Labor Relations Commission and the Seoul Labor Relations Commission’s office located in Nowon-gu, Seoul, Nowon-gu, 250 (hereinafter “Seoul Labor Relations Commission”); (b) as if he was a pro-friendly G with no authority for the purpose of exercising an interrogation of the theft case by receiving a suspect interrogation from a slope F belonging to the said police station; and (c) written “G” in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged his signature in the name of G.

3. On November 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) submitted to the said F the protocol of interrogation of a suspect with a signature forged at the same time, at the same place; (b) around November 3, 2013, at the same time, at the same place; and (c) made the F bound the document to be bound in the investigation records.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised a forged private signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police interrogation protocol of the accused (13 pages of investigation record);

1. Written statements of D;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, repeated statements, copies of written judgments, investigation reports (verification reports at the final date and conclusive date);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Articles 329 and 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the crime of this case among the suspended crimes for the reasons of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is committed, and the defendant is against the defendant, and the amount of damage is large.

arrow