logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.09.26 2013고단1437
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle at the horse level B;

On May 5, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol of 0.089% with blood alcohol concentration of 0.085% on a breath on May 22 and 5, 2013, while driving the said car, and driving the one-lane in front of the Hancheon-dong located in the Hancheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, into the lux apartment screen, due to occupational negligence of the victim C (29 years old) who temporarily stopped for the air traffic signal at the time when he neglected the duty of Jeoncheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, thereby suffering from the back 5 car driver of the said horse c. (29 years old) and caused the victim to suffer from the shock c.m. which requires approximately three-day medical treatment.

2. On May 5, 2013, around 23:42, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) performed a alcohol measurement at the transportation survey center office in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, for the same reason as that set forth in paragraph (1); (b) stated the Defendant’s birth F resident registration number as the Defendant’s resident registration number to the police affiliated with the traffic accident investigation department in the Nowon-gu Police Station; and (c) made a statement

3. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. For the purpose of exercising the time and place set forth in paragraph (2), the Defendant forged the signature of the Defendant, without authority, stating “F” in the driver’s name column of the report on detection of the driver of a junish-type driver with the color pen

B. In order to exercise the right at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), the Defendant forged the signature of the Defendant by stating “F” in the “F” on the driver’s name column of the circumstantial statement report using the crym-type pen without authority.

C. At the time and place specified in paragraph (2), the Defendant submitted to the assistant E of the Transport Survey Team affiliated with the Nowon Police Station, who forged the above signature, the report on detection of the primary driver and the report on the circumstantial statement of the primary driver, thereby exercising the forged signature. D.

The Defendant on May 12, 2013

arrow