logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2012.09.20 2012고단722
변호사법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At Sung-nam-si ordered a construction project of C (hereinafter “instant construction project”) and selected five companies from among the 21 companies registered with the Public Procurement Service, which proposed the highest reduction rate compared with the contract price, the construction project is the contract cycle by selecting the company as the delivery company.

The defendant was working as the vice-chairperson of the Association of Sungnam-si, and accordingly, he was able to exercise his influence over the administration of Sungnam-si.

G running Co., Ltd. E and F are linked to the above written suit, and after selecting a bidder with companies that can be able to bid bid rate collusion during the bidding process of the instant construction project, the Defendant sent a request to the public official in charge of gender male viewing service for the solicitation of bid, and received an influence amount in return for the request.

2. The case holding that on August 16, 201, the Defendant violated the Attorney-at-Law Act: (a) upon receiving a request from G to the effect that “it is anticipated that he will make a tender while awarding an order for construction work in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Seoul-si; (b) it would be sufficiently possible for G to select five companies determined within this time as a participating company by inviting public officials in charge of Sungnam-gu to participate in bidding in collusion with four bidding businesses; and (c) G would give 10% of the ordered price of construction work to B; and (d) the lower company should not be seen as creating five companies from among the top 10 trading agencies; and (d) on or around August 16, 2011, it would be sufficiently possible to obtain the consent of the construction work from G in the vicinity-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul-si, Seoul-si, to obtain the consent of the construction work in collusion with G.

arrow