logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015. 8. 27. 선고 2014나60148 판결
[손해배상(기)][미간행]
Plaintiff, Appellant and Appellant

Plaintiff 1 and one other (Attorney Seo Chang-il, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellants and Appellants

Republic of Korea (Government Law Firm Corporation, Attorneys Tae Tae-Gyeong et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

July 23, 2015

The first instance judgment

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2011Da449749 Decided October 23, 2014

Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the defendant's appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 1 10 million won, 5 million won per annum from November 10, 201 to the service date of a duplicate of complaint, and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment (the plaintiff shall be deemed to have reduced the purport of the claim in the court by the petition of appeal).

2. Purport of appeal

A. The plaintiff

Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the order to pay below shall be revoked. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs 1 8,800,000 won, 4,200,000 won to the plaintiffs 2, and 5% per annum from November 10, 201 to the service date of a duplicate of the petition of appeal, and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment.

B. Defendant

The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and all of the plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the above revocation are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation on this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Park Jae-sik (Presiding Judge)

arrow