logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.01.11 2016고단1040
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for six months, for six months, and for six months, for six months, for each of the defendants C.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 30, 2016, Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) committed at “G” restaurant operated by the victim F (42 years of age) in Gunsan-si, Gunsan-si. Defendant B and Si expenses as a matter of Defendant B’s intent to smoke in tobacco in a restaurant. Defendant A and Defendant A were the victim and Si expenses. Defendant A led the victim’s face with the hand floor once at one time and one hand with the victim’s face. Defendant B combined with this, Defendant B led the victim’s right-hand hand once at one time, the victim’s right-hand hand was turned back with the hand, and Defendant B took the part of the victim’s face with the hand, etc., Defendant C Do Do, and Do kn the victim’s face with his hand.

As a result, the Defendants jointly committed a damage to the victim F in the inner area, which requires treatment for about five days, and to the victim F in the mouth.

2. Defendant A’s interference with the performance of official duties, Defendant A’s injury at the above “G” restaurant around 02:00 on June 30, 2016, and Defendant A demanded personal information from her slope I (45 years old) affiliated with the military police station, the military police station, the police station, in receipt of a 112 report on the act as referred to in paragraph 1 of the said Article, who was dispatched to the site and received a request from Defendant A (45 years old). However, Defendant A expressed a bath to the said police officer, and she took one time the left face of the said police officer.

As a result, Defendant A interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer with respect to the handling of the 112 Report Affairs by the police officer, and at the same time, Defendant A was on the bridges that require treatment for about 10 days between the above victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Written Statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Defendant A: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), Defendant B, and Article 2 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act.

arrow