logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.03.28 2017나60147
부당이득금
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 29, 2006, the Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant insurance”). The Defendant is the policyholder, the insured, and the beneficiary of the instant insurance.

B. After entering into the instant insurance contract with the Plaintiff from June 10, 207 to March 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) concluded the instant insurance contract with the Plaintiff, on the following grounds: B hospital, C hospital, DNA surgery, Tol University hospital, Ethical surgery, F-type surgery, G-type surgery, H clinic, etc.; (b) in the G-type surgery; (c) in the I-type surgery; (d) catitis; (d) catitis; (e) catitis; (e) catitis; (e) catitis; (e) catitis; (e) catitis; (f) 4-5 patch escape; (f) catitis; (f) 3-5, 40,000,000 per the instant insurance contract; and (f) kneeume, 17,70,000 per the instant insurance contract.

The details of the accident, the number of days of hospitalization of 207-06-06-10 per day of hospitalization of 2007-06-10 disease, and 31 - 1,430,000 to 209-02-05 disease, 250,00- 3,250- 3,250- 3,200- 3,207-20-6, 200-6, 200-6, 200-6, 200-6, 200-6, 200-6, 207, 20-6, 200-6, 20-6, 200-6, 206, 20-6, 30-6, 205, 20-7, 90-2,05, 9-2,00-1,00-2,00 of the disease.

arrow