beta
Text
Defendant
E Imprisonment for ten months, each of the defendants C, F, A, and B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
Defendant
C, F, A, B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
C On February 11, 2019, Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence in August, 201 to imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint confinement) and special larceny at the Jeju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 19th of the same month.
Defendant
A On February 11, 2019, the Jeju District Court sentenced on one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint confinement) and for a special larceny, which became final and conclusive on June 28, 2019.
Defendants were indicted on March 30, 2017, around 30, 2017, on the part of the victim, parked in the No.N located in the No.N located in Jeju-si, on the part of the victim, to discover the victim's cash 3 million won (500,000 won) owned by the victim (500,000 won) in a cresh in the driver's seat in the No.S. car, and to theft and divide them. Defendant C opened a driver's seat in the car and opened a cash 3 million won in cash, and then, Defendant A, B, and D took a theft of KRW 1.5 million with the share of KRW 1.5 million for Defendant C, F, and E.
1. Defendant E denies the fact that Defendant E participated in a special larceny crime by denying the fact that “C was unable to entirely anticipate the victim to have deducted or stolen money, and there was no fact that C, etc. divided money,” in the court of first instance of the instant case, the issue was whether the Defendant participated in the special larceny crime and divided the cash that was stolen by the Defendant.
Accordingly, in order to support the Defendant’s assertion of innocence of special larceny in the trial process and to escape criminal punishment, the Defendant had C and F, an accomplice of special larceny, “the Defendant did not have to divide the money of the stolen victim,” and had the Defendant make a false testimony consistent with his/her assertion in the court.
Defendant from August 2018 to the same year.
9. Before the first police officer, the Domini (C) was the victim’s money at the mutual infinite coffee shop within Jeju.