Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 10, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jeju District Court on October 10, 2008. On September 4, 2009, the court issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the same crime; and on August 4, 2010, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime.
【Criminal Facts】 On April 29, 2016, at around 03:25, the Defendant driven a C-Ad-di vehicle at approximately 800 meters away from C-Ad-di vehicle in the section of approximately 800 meters away from C-Ad-ri, Samdo-dong, Samdo-ro, Jeju-do, to the front day of the Goprod-ri Samsung C-ro 39, a day-to-day mobile city in the same city.
On October 10, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jeju District Court on October 10, 2008; on September 4, 2009, the court issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the same crime; on August 4, 2010, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime.
【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 On April 13, 2016, around 03:15, the Defendant driven a C-Addi vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 50 meters alcohol concentration of 0.09% from the section of about 500 meters from the front of the Jeju Pharmaceutical Association, which is located in the C-Addidong-dong, Samdo-dong, Jeju, to the front road of the Jeju Pharmaceutical Association located in the same City-nam-ro 92.
On December 8, 2011, the Defendant sentenced Jeju District Court to one year for fraud, and completed the execution of the above punishment on December 7, 2012.
On April 25, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F (FF) in the “EC” located in Jeju-si, Jeju-si, that “The Defendant would pay a profit if he/she lends the money to purchase a heavy vehicle at a level of KRW 3 million per vehicle if he/she sells a heavy vehicle.”
However, the defendant thought that he will receive money from the victim to use it for living expenses, and there was no other way to purchase the used vehicle, so even if he receives money from the victim as a result of the purchase of the used vehicle.