beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) KRW 58,233,966; and (b) to the Selection C, KRW 56,233,966; and (c) to each of them.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The relevant Plaintiff (Appointed Party A) and the Appointed Party C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) were female students of the network D (Death April 14, 2016) (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) and they finally inherited D’s rights due to the death of both parents of D during the instant lawsuit.
D has been hospitalized in the F Hospital located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Hospital"), and the defendant is an educational foundation with the aim of middle school and higher education, which establishes and operates the above defendant hospital.
B. D 1) On July 8, 2015, 2015, she was diagnosed as satisfying cancer as a result of the test conducted at the time of the internal border test conducted by the upper Minister. D she was within the Defendant Hospital on July 14, 2015. The inside and outside of the Defendant Hospital was re-run the internal border test conducted at the upper Minister, and the Defendant Hospital diagnosed D with the troping type of satfy, bad faith, high blood pressure, and satisfying symptoms. 2) After having been sentenced to the blood species surgery, D she was diagnosed as hyecing medicine, from July 22, 2015 to February 25, 2016.
D's size of 11.9cm at the time of the initial diagnosis x 8.5cm x 7 cm as a result of the py CT implemented on October 23, 2015 x 6.5 cm x 5 cm as a result of the uniforms CT implemented on February 15, 2016 x 5.5 cm x 5.5 cm. However, although it is difficult to expect any further effect of the pharmacologic, it was presented a comprehensive opinion that it is necessary to take an external agents from the 18 February 18, 2016.
C. On February 28, 2016, the Defendant prepared to perform the instant surgery by hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital and prepared to perform the surgery, and on February 29, 2016, the following day, the Defendant received a delivery from the outside of the Defendant Hospital and the H on February 29, 2016 (hereinafter “instant surgery”).
The opinion of pathology on the part of the operation at the time is a kind of 's.'.