logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.10.06 2014가합106708
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relevant Defendant medical corporation B is the operator of the hospital and the Defendant social welfare foundation C is the operator of the hospital.

B. On March 30, 2011, the Plaintiff at the D Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant 1 Hospital”) 1’s medical examination and treatment is on the same year as the No. 554, May 30, 201.

4. By August, 400, Defendant 1 was hospitalized in Defendant 1 Hospital.

During the above period, the Plaintiff showed the reduction of the weight of 3kg price, the reduction of the total weight, the reduction of the overall length, and the increase of the pulse.

Defendant 1 Hospital’s fire extinguishers and medical professionals discharged the Plaintiff after they conducted chest CT, food assistance surgery, internal border test of the superior minister, and 24 hours food and delivery test.

2) Even after the Plaintiff’s appeal to the symptoms, such as the difficult smoke. Defendant 1’s firefighting machine and medical team in Defendant 1’s hospital requested a psychiatrist to conduct a diagnosis for the exclusion diagnosis by making the Plaintiff feel suspicion of the physical symptoms, satisfitis, etc., and hospitalized the Plaintiff from October 31, 201 to November 15 of the same year. During the above period, the Plaintiff complained of the difficult meals, and there was no apparent improvement of symptoms. Accordingly, Defendant 1 hospital’s fire extinguishers and medical team in the hospital were to observe the progress of the outpatient, and the Plaintiff was discharged from the hospital as of November 1, 201.

4 The fire extinguishers and medical professionals within Defendant 1 Hospital shall be on March 23, 2012, and the same year.

4. 26. 26. The plaintiff requested a psychiatrist to treat the plaintiff as a mental patient and was in a drug room, but there was no major symptoms on the roadway.

5) From July 2012, Defendant 1 hospital’s psychosis and medical professionals treated the Plaintiff. C. Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant 2 hospital”)

(1) On December 4, 2012, the Plaintiff mainly complained of the difficulty in tobacco and applied to Defendant 2’s hospital.

The medical personnel of Defendant 2 Hospital shall conduct the Plaintiff’s internal border, food internal pressure test, food aid test, and chest X-ray test.

arrow