(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.02.01 2010나7052

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.02.01 2010나7052

손해배상(의)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs, which ordered payment below, shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties 1) Net C (hereinafter “the deceased”).

on July 31, 2007, the annual rent medical center operated by the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”).

the same year after being subject to the Medical dysium, etc.;

9. 14. Death.

2) The Plaintiff A is the deceased’s wife, and the Plaintiff B is the deceased’s wife. B. The deceased’s Defendant hospital’s hospitalization and operation1) was conducted at the National Health Insurance Corporation’s Japanese Hospital around July 4, 2007, and was diagnosed as the result of the diagnosis.

2) On July 5, 2007, the Deceased was at the Defendant hospital’s expense to undergo blood test (marmarks), and around July 9, 2007, the Deceased was given medical treatment from the Defendant hospital’s physician D. (3) around July 9, 2007, the Deceased performed a computer-to-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to

4) On July 30, 2007, the Deceased was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital in order to undergo the above-mentioned operation, and on July 31, 2007, the Defendant Hospital conducted the laparing test on the Deceased before the above-mentioned operation, and confirmed the progress of the laparing and laparing to the Deceased, and opened the laparing operation to remove the laparing quantity in the above-mentioned government (hereinafter “the instant operation”).

(5) The deceased’s garment removed as above was 6.5 x 5.2 m. The size was 6.5 x 5.2 m. The location map was relatively broad from the intermediate part to the beginning part of the above, and 30 m. from the above 31 m., which had already been transferred to 30 out of the 31 m. 31 m., and was executed after the above operation.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2015.02.12 2013가합8789

-광주지방법원 2014.12.18 2013가합55357

-서울서부지방법원 2010.08.12 2008가단14209

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.22 2016가합521698

-창원지방법원진주지원 2015.11.18 2013가합3180